1 This publication presents key indicators from the 2018 Health Literacy Survey (HLS), including information on:
- nine domains of health literacy (such as how people find, understand and use health information, how they manage their health and interact with healthcare providers) together with:
- key health risk factors and health conditions, and
- demographic, socioeconomic characteristics.
2 The HLS was conducted throughout Australia from January 2018 to August 2018.
Scope of the survey
3 The HLS was conducted with a sample drawn from respondents 18 years and over who had already participated in the 2017-18 National Health Survey (NHS) and agreed to be contacted for further ABS surveys. As such the HLS data was combined with that of the NHS, and information related to survey scope, coverage, data collection, input coding and data quality issues for both the NHS and HLS are included below where relevant.
4 Urban and rural areas in all states and territories were included, while Very Remote areas of Australia and discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities were excluded. These exclusions are unlikely to affect national estimates, and will only have a minor effect on aggregate estimates produced for individual states and territories, excepting the Northern Territory where the population living in Very Remote areas accounts for around 20.3% of persons.
5 Non-private dwellings such as hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes and short-stay caravan parks were excluded from the survey. This may affect estimates of the number of people with some long-term health conditions (for example, conditions which may require periods of hospitalisation or long term care).
6 The HLS was limited to adults aged 18 years and over.
7 The following groups were excluded from the survey:
- certain diplomatic personnel of overseas governments, customarily excluded from the Census and estimated resident population;
- persons whose usual place of residence was outside Australia;
- members of non-Australian Defence forces (and their dependents) stationed in Australia; and
- visitors to private dwellings.
8 Dwellings for the NHS were selected at random using a multistage area sample of private dwellings. The initial sample selected for the survey consisted of approximately 25,109 dwellings. This was reduced to a sample of 21,544 after sample loss (for example, households selected in the survey which had no residents in scope of the survey, vacant or derelict buildings, buildings under construction). Of those remaining dwellings, 16,376 (or 76.0%) were fully or adequately responding, yielding a total sample for the survey of 21,315 persons.
|NHS 17-18 Households in sample||3 271||2 612||3 364||1 658||1 656||1 605||1 089||1 121||16 376|
|Households approached for HLS that agreed to be contacted (after sample loss)||1 303||1 150||1 334||824||765||716||434||698||7224|
|Fully responding HLS sample||1 021||924||1 047||650||601||592||348||608||5790|
|Response rate for HLS only (%)||78.4||80.3||78.5||78.9||72.9||82.7||80.2||87.1||80.1|
|Response rate of total NHS sample (%)||31.2||35.3||31.1||39.2||36.3||36.9||31.9||54.2||35.3|
Approached sample, final sample and response rates
9 The sample for the HLS was taken from the total initial sample of 16,376 fully or adequately responding households enumerated for the NHS. The actual HLS sample approached was 7,224 households. Of these households in the actual sample, 5,790 (80.1%) were fully responding households. This represents an overall response rate of 35.3% when measured against the total initial sample of respondents to the NHS.
11 The HLS was conducted by trained ABS interviewers over the telephone using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI). Information gathered through the 2017-18 NHS was collected via personal interviews with selected residents in sampled dwellings. One adult (aged 18 years and over) in each dwelling was selected and interviewed about their own health characteristics as well as information about the household (for example, income of other household members).
Weighting, benchmarking and estimation
12 Weighting is a process of adjusting results from a sample survey to infer results for the in-scope total population. To do this, a weight is allocated to each sample unit; for example, a household or a person. The weight is a value which indicates how many population units are represented by the sample unit. The file contains weights for both the 2017-18 NHS and the HLS. When analysing information from the HLS, the HLS weights must be used.
13 The first step in calculating NHS weights for each person was to assign an initial weight, which was equal to the inverse of the probability of being selected in the survey. For example, if the probability of a person being selected in the survey was 1 in 600, then the person would have an initial weight of 600 (that is, they represent 600 others). An adjustment was then made to these initial weights to account for the time period in which a person was assigned to be enumerated.
14 The weights are calibrated to align with independent estimates of the population of interest, referred to as 'benchmarks', in designated categories of sex by age by area of usual residence. Weights calibrated against population benchmarks in this way compensate for over or under-enumeration of particular categories of persons and ensure that the survey estimates conform to the independently estimated distribution of the population by age, sex and area of usual residence, rather than to the distribution within the sample itself.
15 The NHS was benchmarked to the estimated resident population living in private dwellings in non-Very Remote areas of Australia at 31 December 2017. Excluded from these benchmarks were persons living in discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. The benchmarks, and hence the estimates from the survey, do not (and are not intended to) match estimates of the total Australian resident population (which include persons living in Very Remote areas or in non-private dwellings, such as hotels) obtained from other sources.
16 HLS data was re-weighted at the person-level for the population aged 18 years and over. The HLS weights were calibrated to the NHS person-level weights for some key variables (i.e. collapsed highest level of education; one-digit country of birth; current daily smoker status; self-assessed health; collapsed disability status; heart/stroke/vascular disease status; and overweight/obese status).
17 Survey estimates of counts of persons are obtained by summing the weights of persons with the characteristic of interest. Estimates of non-person counts (for example, number of health conditions) are obtained by multiplying the characteristic of interest with the weight of the reporting person and aggregating.
18 In addition to weighted estimates. this release also includes weighted mean Health Literacy Scores. This summary statistic is expressed as the mean of the values for each health literacy domain, falling within a range of 1-4 or 1-5 depending on the domain.
Reliability of estimates
19 All sample surveys are subject to sampling and non-sampling error.
20 Sampling error is the difference between estimates, derived from a sample of persons, and the value that would have been produced if all persons in scope of the survey had been included. Indications of the level of sampling error for estimates are given by the Relative Standard Error (RSE) and 95% Margin of Error (MoE). For more information refer to the Technical Note - Reliability of Estimates.
21 In this publication, estimates with an RSE of 25% to 50% are preceded by an asterisk (e.g. *3.4) to indicate that the estimate has a high level of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, and should be used with caution. Estimates with an RSE over 50% are indicated by a double asterisk (e.g. **0.6) and are generally considered too unreliable for most purposes.
22 Margins of Error are provided for proportions to assist users in assessing the reliability of these data. Estimates of proportions with an MoE more than 10% are annotated to indicate they are subject to high sample variability and particular consideration should be given to the MoE when using these estimates. Depending on how the estimate is to be used, an MoE greater than 10% may be considered too large to inform decisions. In addition, estimates with a corresponding standard 95% confidence interval that includes 0% or 100% are annotated with a # to indicate that they are usually considered unreliable for most purposes.
23 Non-sampling error may occur in any data collection, whether it is based on a sample or a full count such as a census. Non-sampling errors occur when survey processes work less effectively than intended. Sources of non-sampling error include non-response, errors in reporting by respondents or in recording of answers by interviewers, and errors in coding and processing data.
23 Non-response occurs when people are unable to or do not cooperate, or cannot be contacted. Non-response can affect the reliability of results and can introduce a bias. The magnitude of any bias depends on the rate of non-response and the extent of the difference between the characteristics of those people who responded to the survey and those who did not.
24 The following methods were adopted to reduce the level and impact of non-response for the 2017-18 NHS:
- face-to-face interviews with respondents;
- the use of proxy interviews in cases where language difficulties were encountered, noting the interpreter was typically a family member;
- follow-up of respondents if there was initially no response; and
- weighting to population benchmarks to reduce non-response bias.
25 To reduce the level and impact of non-response for the HLS, respondents were followed-up via telephone on multiple occasions if there was initially no response.
Interpretation of results
26 Care has been taken to ensure that results are as accurate as possible. This includes thorough design and testing of the questionnaire, interviews being conducted by trained ABS interviewers, and quality control procedures throughout data collection, processing and output. There remain, however, other factors which may have affected the reliability of results, and for which no specific adjustments can be made. The following factors should be considered when interpreting these estimates:
- Information recorded in the survey is essentially 'as reported' by respondents, and hence may differ from information available from other sources or collected using different methodology; for example, information about health conditions is self-reported and, while not directly based on a diagnosis by a medical practitioner in the survey, respondents were asked whether they had ever been told by a doctor or nurse that they had a particular health condition. Conditions which have a greater effect on people's well-being or lifestyle, or those specifically mentioned in survey questions, are expected in general to have been better reported than others; and
- Some respondents may have provided responses that they felt were expected, rather than those that accurately reflected their own situation. Every effort has been made to minimise such bias through the development and use of appropriate survey methodology;
27 For reporting purposes, the HLS response category of 'difficult' combines three separate response variables contained in the HLQ: ‘sometimes difficult’, ‘usually difficult’ and ‘cannot do or always difficult’. This applies to domains 6 to 9 only. For domains 1 to 5, the 'strongly disagree' and 'disagree' categories from the HLQ have been combined and are referred to as 'strongly disagree/disagree'.
28 In the HLS, respondents were told that the term 'healthcare providers' encompassed doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, dieticians and any other health workers that respondents seek advice or treatment from.
29 Long-term health conditions reported by respondents in the NHS are presented using a classification originally developed for the 2001 NHS by the Family Medicine Research Centre, University of Sydney, in conjunction with the ABS. The classification is based on the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and is used for all years from 2001 to 2017-18.
30 Country of birth is classified to the Standard Australian Classification of Countries (cat. no. 1269.0).
31 Main language spoken at home is classified according to the Australian Standard Classification of Languages (cat. no. 1267.0).
32 Descriptions of data items such as Body Mass Index and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) are included in the Glossary to this publication.
33 The Census and Statistics Act, 1905 provides the authority for the ABS to collect statistical information, and requires that statistical output shall not be published or disseminated in a manner that is likely to enable the identification of a particular person or organisation. This requirement means that the ABS must take care and make assurances that any statistical information about individual respondents cannot be derived from published data.
34 To minimise the risk of identifying individuals in aggregate statistics, a technique known as perturbation is used to randomly adjust cell values. Perturbation involves a small random adjustment of the statistics and is considered the most satisfactory technique for avoiding the release of identifiable statistics while maximising the range of information that can be released. These adjustments have a negligible impact on the underlying pattern of the statistics. After perturbation, a given published cell value will be consistent across all tables. However, adding up cell values to derive a total will not necessarily give the same result as published totals.
35 Perturbation has been applied to the estimates in this release. Perturbation has not been applied to the mean Health Literacy Scores.
36 Estimates presented in this publication have been rounded.
37 Proportions presented in this publication are based on unrounded estimates. Calculations using rounded estimates may differ from those published.
38 ABS publications draw extensively on information provided freely by individuals, businesses, governments and other organisations. Their continued cooperation is very much appreciated; without it, the wide range of statistics published by the ABS would not be available. Information received by the ABS is treated in strict confidence as required by the Census and Statistics Act, 1905.
Products and services
39 Summary results from the HLS are available in spreadsheet form from the 'Data oownloads' section in this release. The statistics presented are only a selection of the information collected.
40 For users who wish to undertake more detailed analysis, a TableBuilder product for the 2017-18 NHS, which includes HLS data, will be available on 30 April 2019. TableBuilder is an online tool for creating tables from ABS survey data, where variables can be selected for cross-tabulation. It has been developed to complement the existing suite of ABS microdata products and services including Census TableBuilder and CURFs. Further information about ABS microdata, including conditions of use, is available via the Microdata section on the ABS website.
41 Customised tabulations are available on request. Subject to confidentiality and sampling variability constraints, tabulations can be produced from the survey incorporating data items, populations and geographic areas selected to meet individual requirements.
42 Current publications and other products released by the ABS are listed on the ABS website. The ABS also issues a daily Release Advice on the website which details products to be released in the week ahead.