About this publication
This publication presents information about federal defendants who were finalised in the criminal jurisdictions of the Higher, Magistrates' and Children's Courts across Australia’s states and territories during the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019. Information is presented about the offences, case outcomes and sentences associated with these defendants.
The data for federal defendants is a subset of the Criminal Courts, Australia (cat. no. 4513.0) publication, which comprises all defendants finalised in Australia’s state and territory criminal courts.
Rounding
Proportions and percentages cited in the publication text have been rounded to the nearest whole number.
Data source
Statistics presented in this publication are compiled based on administrative unit record data supplied to the ABS by the agencies responsible for courts administration in each state and territory, with the exception of Queensland (where data are supplied via the Office of the Government Statistician), and New South Wales (where data are supplied via the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research).
In order to ensure consistency between the states and territories, each one is required to provide data coded to national classifications and standards. For more information see ‘Classifications’ section.
Scope and coverage
This publication presents statistics about persons and organisations whose cases have been finalised within the criminal jurisdictions of the Higher, Magistrates' or Children's Courts during the reference period for at least one offence against Commonwealth legislation, with the exception of:
- Persons under 10 years of age
- Civil court matters
- Appeal cases
- Tribunal matters
- Cases which do not require the adjudication of charges (e.g. bail reviews and applications to amend sentences or penalties)
- Defendants for whom a bench warrant is issued but not executed
- Finalisations in specialist courts, such as drug courts, electronic courts, fine recovery units and Indigenous courts
- Pre-court diversionary programs (warnings, cautions, drug diversions, conferencing)
- Bench warrants in the Higher Courts
- Referrals to mental health review tribunals (e.g. for determination of fitness for trial).
The following offences (based on the Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC), 2011 (cat. no. 1234.0)) are excluded:
- Breach of home detention (1512)
- Breach of suspended sentence (1513)
- Breach of community service order (1521)
- Breach of parole (1522)
- Breach of bail (1523)
- Breach of bond – probation (1524)
- Breach of bond – other (1525)
- Breach of community-based order, n.e.c. (1529).
The geographic definition of Australia, as used by the ABS, includes 'Other Territories'. Defendants finalised on Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Christmas Island are included in the counts for Western Australia, where applicable. Defendants finalised in Jervis Bay Territory are not included.
The Australian Road Rules (maintained by the National Transport Commission) only apply in each state and territory if they have been enacted by legislation. For example, in the Northern Territory, offences against the Australian Road Rules are identified as federal offences. To ensure consistency across all states and territories, the Australian Road Rules and the associated state and territory enacting legislation are excluded from the scope of the Federal Defendants collection.
For comparability purposes, federal offences based on national laws enacted under state and territory legislation are excluded from the scope of the Federal Defendants collection from 2016–17. Data for 2015–16 (published in the 2016–17 issue) were revised to reflect this change. Caution should be used when making historical comparisons.
Court levels
The Higher, Magistrates' and Children's Courts deal with different types of matters. There are differences across states and territories in how the courts are structured and the legislation that governs the types of offences that can be heard summarily or on indictment.
Higher Courts
All states and territories have a Supreme Court that deals with the most serious criminal matters, generally referred to as an indictable offence (e.g. murder, manslaughter, serious sexual offences, assault, drug trafficking, robbery). The larger states (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia) also have an intermediate level of court, known as the District Court or County Court, which deal with the majority of serious offences. In this publication, the Supreme and Intermediate courts are collectively referred to as the ‘Higher Courts’.
All defendants that are dealt with by the Higher Courts have an automatic entitlement to a trial before a judge and jury. In some states and territories, the defendant may elect to have their matter(s) heard before a judge alone. Children treated as adults by the court may be included in the Higher Courts defendant counts.
Magistrates' Courts
The lowest level of criminal court is the Magistrates’ Court (also known as the Court of Summary Jurisdiction, Local Court or Court of Petty Sessions) which hears the majority of all criminal cases. Cases heard in the Magistrates’ Courts do not involve a jury – rather, a magistrate determines whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. This is known as a summary proceeding. Children treated as adults by the courts may also be finalised in the Magistrates' Courts.
Children's Courts
Each state and territory has Children's Courts to deal with offences alleged to have been committed by a child or juvenile. These courts mainly hear summary proceedings, but do have the power to hear indictable matters in some states and territories.
In all states and territories, a person can only be charged with a criminal offence where they are aged 10 years or over. Defendants are considered to be a child/juvenile where they are under 18 years of age at the time they committed an offence. Prior to February 2018, defendants in Queensland were considered to be a child/juvenile by the courts where they were aged under 17 years.
Reference period
The statistics in this collection relate to federal defendants finalised during the reference period: 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019.
Classifications
Classifications provide a framework for organising and presenting data in a comparable and consistent manner. The classifications used for this collection are based upon the National Criminal Courts Data Dictionary (cat. no. 4527.0). The Dictionary – which was developed by the National Criminal Courts Statistics Unit (NCCSU) of the ABS in collaboration with key stakeholders – defines national data items and concepts that underpin the ABS and Council of Australian Governments (CoAG) criminal courts collections.
The key classifications used for this collection are:
- Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC) (Appendix 1)
- Method of Finalisation Classification (Appendix 2)
- Sentence Type Classification (Appendix 3)
- Federal Offence Group (Appendix 4).
ANZSOC
Offence data are presented according to the Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC), 2011 (cat. no. 1234.0). Changes to this classification, since its first release as the Australian Standard Offence Classification 1997 (cat. no. 1234.0) (ASOC97), are described in a Technical Note in the 2008–09 issue of this publication.
For ease of reading, some ANZSOC offence names have been abbreviated throughout this publication as follows:
- Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons appear as 'Dangerous/negligent acts'
- Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person appear as 'Abduction/harassment'
- Robbery, extortion and related offences appear as ‘Robbery/extortion’
- Unlawful entry with intent/burglary, break and enter appear as 'Unlawful entry with intent'
- Theft and related offences appear as ‘Theft’
- Fraud, deception and related offences appear as ‘Fraud/deception’
- Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences appear as 'Weapons/explosives'
- Offences against justice procedures, government security and government operations appear as 'Offences against justice'.
Method of finalisation
Method of finalisation refers to how a criminal charge is concluded by a criminal court. The Method of Finalisation Classification (Appendix 2) contains the main categories of:
- Adjudicated finalisation – a judgement or decision by the court as to whether or not the defendant is guilty of the charge(s) against them
- Non-adjudicated finalisation – a charge(s) considered to have been completed even though a judgement has not been handed down by the court (e.g. withdrawn by the prosecution, defendant deceased, unfit to plead, or transfers to non-court agencies)
- Transfers to other court levels – a court order for the criminal charge(s) to be transferred to another court level for adjudication or sentencing.
Sentence type
The Sentence Type Classification (Appendix 3) describes the types of sentences that are handed down by the court for offences proven guilty, including the main categories of:
- Custodial orders – sentences that restrict the liberty of a defendant for a specified period of time (e.g. detainment in an institution or home, or regular supervision by corrections personnel while residing in the community)
- Non-custodial orders – sentences that do not involve being held in custody (e.g. fines, community service orders, good behaviour bonds).
Defendants can receive:
- A single sentence for a single offence proven guilty
- A single sentence for multiple offences proven guilty
- Multiple sentences for a single offence proven guilty
- Multiple sentences for multiple offences proven guilty.
In some cases, defendants with a method of finalisation of 'not guilty by reason of mental illness/condition' may have some kind of sentence/order imposed. However, these sentences are not included in this collection.
Federal offence group
The federal offence groups presented in this collection provide an alternate way (to the ANZSOC) of grouping/classifying federal offences, based on offence types that are of particular interest to users of data relating to federal offending/defendants.
The federal offence groups presented are determined using Commonwealth Act level information, with the exception of offences against the Criminal Code Act 1995, Crimes Act 1914, Migration Act 1958, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 and Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 which are assigned using both Act and Section level information. The groups are subject to regular review, as per changes to federal legislation and emerging user needs. As such, caution should be used when making historical comparisons by federal offence group.
The federal offence groups are not an ABS standard or related to ANZSOC, and may comprise a range of offences that reside in a number of different ANZSOC divisions. For more information about the groups (including definitions and the Commonwealth Acts, Sections and ANZSOC categories contained within these groups) refer to Appendix 4.
Counting methodology
The principal counting unit for this collection is the finalised defendant.
A finalised defendant is defined as a person or organisation for whom all charges within a case have been formally completed so that they cease to be an active item of work for the court during the reference period.
The Federal Defendants collection does not enumerate unique persons, instead the following counting rules are applied:
- Where a defendant is finalised for more than one case, on the same date and in the same court level, their records are merged and they are counted as one finalised defendant
- Where a defendant is finalised for more than one case, on separate dates within the reference period, they will be counted once for each date they were finalised
- Where a defendant is finalised in the Magistrates' Courts whilst other charges are committed to, and finalised in the Higher Courts, they will be counted once for each court level they were finalised in during the reference period.
Transfers
The following counting rules apply with regards to defendants transferred from, or between court levels:
- Defendants transferred from one Higher Court level to another Higher Court level are considered as initiated only once (in the level they first entered) and finalised only once (from the level they finally left)
- Defendants transferred from a Magistrates' Court to a Higher Court (or vice versa) are considered as initiated twice (once in each of the courts) and finalised twice (once in each of the courts)
- Defendants transferred between the Children's Courts and the Magistrates' or Higher Courts (or vice versa) are considered to be initiated twice (once in each of the courts) and finalised twice (once in each of the courts)
- Defendants transferred from the Magistrates' or Children's Courts to specialist courts for finalisation (e.g. Drug Courts, Indigenous Courts) are considered finalised (by transfer) in the criminal court that initiated the transfer. Defendants may then, upon completion of the program, return to the court that requested the transfer, for an additional finalisation.
Defendants with more serious offences (e.g. Homicide and related offences, Robbery/extortion or Sexual assault and related offences) are more likely than other defendants to be transferred from the Magistrates' to the Higher Courts for adjudication or sentencing. This should be taken into consideration when interpreting the relative proportions of transfers and defendants proven guilty for these offences.
Data items
Defendants who were finalised for more than one federal offence during the reference period will have counting rules applied to determine their principal method of finalisation, offence, sentence type and other characteristics for inclusion in data tables.
Method of finalisation
For defendants who had multiple charges with varying outcomes, the method of finalisation is assigned based on the following order of precedence:
Higher Courts:
- Defendant deceased
- Unfit to plead
- Not guilty by reason of mental illness/condition
- Guilty finding by court
- Charge proven n.f.d.
- Guilty plea by defendant
- Acquitted by court
- Charge unproven n.f.d.
- Charge unproven n.e.c.
- Transfer from a Higher Court to a Magistrates' Court
- Other transfer between court levels n.e.c.
- Transfer to non-court agency
- Withdrawn by the prosecution
- Other non-adjudicated finalisation n.e.c.
- Unknown/not stated.
Magistrates’ Courts:
- Defendant deceased
- Unfit to plead
- Not guilty by reason of mental illness/condition
- Guilty finding by court
- Charge proven n.f.d.
- Guilty plea by defendant
- Guilty ex-parte
- Acquitted by court
- Charge unproven n.f.d.
- No case to answer at committal
- Charge unproven n.e.c.
- Committed for trial
- Transfer from a Magistrates' Court to a Higher Court n.f.d.
- Committed for sentence
- Transfer from a Magistrates' Court to a Higher Court n.e.c.
- Other transfer between court levels n.e.c.
- Transfer to non-court agency
- Withdrawn by the prosecution
- Other non-adjudicated finalisation n.e.c.
- Unknown/not stated.
Children’s Courts:
- Defendant deceased
- Unfit to plead
- Not guilty by reason of mental illness/condition
- Guilty finding by court
- Charge proven n.f.d.
- Guilty plea by defendant
- Guilty ex-parte
- Acquitted by court
- Charge unproven n.f.d.
- No case to answer at committal
- Charge unproven n.e.c.
- Committed for trial
- Transfer from a Children's Court to a Higher court n.f.d.
- Committed for sentence
- Transfer from a Children's Court to a Higher Court n.e.c.
- Transfer from a Children's Court to a Magistrates' Court
- Other transfer between court levels n.e.c.
- Transfer to non-court agency
- Withdrawn by the prosecution
- Other non-adjudicated finalisation n.e.c.
- Unknown/not stated.
Principal federal offence
The principal federal offence presented in this collection refers to the most serious federal offence (based on ANZSOC) associated with a finalised defendant. Where a defendant has been finalised for more than one federal offence type, the method of finalisation and National Offence Index (NOI) (cat. no.1234.0.55.001) - a ranking of offences based on the concept of 'offence seriousness' used to determine the principal federal offence. The following rules apply:
- For defendants finalised with a single federal offence, this is their principal federal offence
- For defendants with multiple charges with differing methods of finalisation, the principal federal offence is selected based on the following order of precedence:
- Defendant deceased, unfit to plead, or not guilty by reason of mental illness
- Charges proven
- Charges not proven
- Transfer of charges
- Charges withdrawn
- Other non-adjudicated finalisation
- Unknown/not stated.
For example, for a defendant finalised as ‘charges proven’ for an obtain benefit by deception offence, and ‘charges not proven’ for a threatening behaviour offence, their principal federal offence would be the obtain benefit by deception.
Where a defendant has multiple charges, each with the same method of finalisation, the NOI is used to determine the principal federal offence (i.e. the charge with the highest ranked ANZSOC code on the NOI).
Where the defendant has an offence that is unable to be determined via the NOI (e.g. due to missing offence information) the principal federal offence is coded to 'not able to be determined'.
The rules underpinning the NOI, in particular defining 'offence seriousness' and the impact of this definition on the ranking of offences, need to be considered when using the principal federal offence data in this publication.
Principal federal offence group
In order to output the federal offence group at the defendant level, a principal federal offence group is derived by selecting the category associated with the principal federal offence. Where there is more than one federal offence group associated with an offence, the hierarchy of the NOI is used to derive the most serious group. For more information, refer to ‘Principal federal offence’ section.
Sentence information
Principal federal sentence
Defendants with more than one sentence type (for either a single offence or multiple offences) are assigned a principal federal sentence, which is intended to reflect the most serious sentence based on the hierarchy of the Sentence Type Classification (Appendix 3).
In most cases, the principal federal sentence will be associated with the principal federal offence (that is, the most serious sentence handed down for the most serious offence). However, because the principal federal sentence is assigned independently of offence information, it is possible for this not to be the case (i.e. where the most serious offence proven guilty has not incurred the most serious/largest sentence). Analysis indicates that the overall number of instances where the principal federal offence and principal federal sentence do not align is small. Users should note this in regards to data tables presenting principal federal offence and principal federal sentence.
It should also be noted that there are some differences in the availability and application of sentence types across states and territories, and over time, which should be taken into consideration when interpreting sentence data.
Duration
This ‘duration’ information presented is a measure of court timeliness, representing the time taken (in days) between the date a defendant’s case(s) was initiated in court and the date they were finalised (i.e. ceased to be an item of work for the court) as follows:
Duration = Date of finalisation – Date of initiation + 1
Note that duration data for New South Wales and the Northern Territory are derived on a different basis (see ‘State and territory specific information’ section).
Comparability
National standards and classifications are used in this collection to produce nationally comparable data (see ‘Classifications’ section). However, various factors can impact data quality and comparability, including:
- Challenges with meeting national standards due to courts data systems being designed for the purpose of administration of court business (as opposed to national statistical purposes)
- Modification over time to data systems and methodology used to extract/compile data
- Refinements to data quality procedures
- Legislative or operational differences across states and territories (e.g. differences in the types of sentencing options available to the courts).
For more specific state and territory information relating to data comparability, refer to ‘State and territory specific information’ section.
Comparisons to other ABS data
Criminal Courts collection
The Federal Defendants collection presents a subset of all defendants finalised in Australia's criminal courts, as published in Criminal Courts, Australia (cat. no. 4513.0). However, as a federal defendant may also be finalised for state or territory offences (in the same reference period), the difference between all finalised defendants and finalised federal defendants does not equal the count of defendants finalised for state/territory offences.
Comparisons to non-ABS sources
The data in this publication may not be comparable to data published in other national and state/territory publications due to differing scope and counting rules.
State and territory specific information
The following information highlights events or processes unique to a state/territory that may have impacted on the data for the Federal Defendants collection. For other state and territory specific issues that have impacted on the Criminal Courts collection more generally, refer to ‘State and territory specific information’ in the Explanatory Notes of Criminal Courts, Australia (cat. no. 4513.0).
New South Wales
Duration data for New South Wales Magistrates' and Children's Courts are based on the date of first appearance rather than the date of registration, because the date of registration is not captured in the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research's (BOCSAR) system (the source of courts data provided to the ABS). This may impact on duration data and therefore caution should be used when making comparisons across states and territories.
New South Wales legislation does not contain discrete offences of stalking, intimidation and harassment and therefore all these offences have been coded to ANZSOC Division 02 Acts intended to cause injury. As such, this division may be overstated and ANZSOC Division 05 Abduction/harassment may be understated. Caution should be used when making comparisons with other states and territories.
Sentence reforms were introduced in New South Wales on 24 September 2018. Intensive Correction Orders were reformed, allowing for a range of conditions to be imposed, including home detention and community service work. Suspended sentences were repealed, as were home detention and community service orders as individual sentences. Good behaviour bonds and non-conviction bonds were also repealed, replaced by community correction orders and conditional release orders. The new sentencing options cover a range of conditions which can be imposed in various combinations and systems and procedures have been updated to allow for the capture of these conditions. These changes have contributed to noticeable increases in custody in the community and community supervision/work orders and noticeable decreases in fully suspended sentences, fines and other non-custodial orders between 2017–18 and 2018–19. Users are therefore advised not to make direct comparisons with previous years.
Victoria
Victoria has a high proportion of defendants with a principal federal offence in ANZSOC Division 14 Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences compared with most other states and territories. This is due to parking offences occurring at airports, charged under Airports (Control of On-Airport Activities) Regulations 1997.
Queensland
In February 2018, the Youth Justice (Transitional) Regulation commenced, with the age range for the youth justice system now including 17 year olds. This regulation resulted in the transfer of 17 year olds from:
- Court proceedings in the Magistrates' Courts to the youth justice system
- Community based orders to Youth Justice supervision
- Adult custody to youth detention, where this is in best interest/safety of the child.
These changes have resulted in:
- An increase in the number of defendants finalised during 2017–18 in the Magistrates courts, via a transfer to the Children’s Courts
- An increase in the number of defendants finalised in the Children's Courts during 2018–19
- A subsequent decrease in the number of defendants aged 17 years being finalised in the Magistrates’ Courts during 2018–19.
A system change in 2017–18 has meant that data on summary offences that are transferred from the Magistrates’ Courts to the Higher Courts have been included in Queensland data for the first time. These data relate to situations where a defendant is charged with an indictable offence and a summary offence in relation to the same incident. Upon the election of the defendant, and with the consent of the court, when the defendant is to be sentenced for the indictable offence in the higher court, the summary offences can, at that point, be transferred to the Higher Court to be sentenced at the same time. The inclusion of this data has resulted in an increase in transfers from Magistrates’ Courts to Higher Courts, and total transfers. Therefore, comparisons between 2017–18 transfers and previous years for Queensland and Australia should be made with caution.
South Australia
In 2018–19, South Australian data were extracted from the new SAPOL Shield system which has different data entry and extraction procedures from the previous recording system. Caution should therefore be used when making historical comparisons.
Western Australia
Detailed data on defendants proven guilty (guilty finding by the court, guilty plea by defendant and guilty ex-parte) are not published for Western Australia. This is due to changes in the quality of these data since the migration of Western Australia’s criminal courts data to the Integrated Courts Management System (ICMS) in November 2013.
Tasmania
Improvements were made to the coding of method of finalisation data in Tasmania's Magistrates' Courts data during 2018–19, impacting on the number of defendants finalised with charges not proven and/or matters withdrawn by the prosecution. Users are advised to exercise caution when making comparisons across years.
The Sentencing Amendment (Phasing out of suspended sentences) Act 2017 came into effect in December, 2017. This introduced new alternatives to suspended sentences such as Home Detention and Community Corrections Orders, impacting on the number of defendants sentenced to a fully suspended sentence and/or community supervision/work order. Users are advised to exercise caution when making comparisons with data prior to 2018–19.
The 2010–11 Federal Defendants collection included data for Tasmanian Magistrates' and Children's Courts only. From 2011–12, data for all court levels are included for Tasmania.
Northern Territory
Date of initiation in Magistrates’ and Children’s courts within the Northern Territory is based on the earliest of: the date the case was filed; the date the case was created; or the date of first appearance.
Australian Capital Territory
The Australian Capital Territory has a high proportion of defendants with a principal federal offence of Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences compared with most other states and territories. This is due to parking offences charged under the Commonwealth Australian National University Parking and Traffic Statute 2007 and the Australian National University Act 1991.
In 2018, ACT Courts records were migrated to the Integrated Court Management System which has different data entry and extraction procedures from the previous recording system. This includes a change to the way defendants are consolidated in the system (such as the removal of duplicate defendant records), which has resulted in a significant reduction in the overall finalised defendant counts for 2018–19. Therefore, comparison of 2018–19 data with previous years should be treated with caution.
Confidentiality of tabular data
The Census and Statistics Act 1905 provides the authority for the ABS to collect statistical information, and requires that statistical output shall not be published or disseminated in a manner that is likely to enable the identification of a particular person or organisation. To minimise the risk of identifying individuals in aggregate statistics, a technique called perturbation is used to randomly adjust cell values and summary variables. This technique, used for the first time for the 2013–14 publication, involves small random adjustment of the statistics and is considered the most satisfactory technique for avoiding the release of identifiable statistics while maximising the range of information that can be released. These adjustments have a negligible impact on the underlying pattern of the statistics.
The result of perturbation is that a given published cell value will be consistent across all tables, but the sum of the components of a total will not necessarily be the same as the published total, in some tables. As such, proportions may add to more or less than 100%. Readers are advised to use the published totals rather than deriving totals based on the component cells. Cells with small values may be proportionally more affected by perturbation than large values. Users are advised against conducting analyses and drawing conclusions based on small values.
Perturbation has been applied to all data presented in this publication as well as data from 2010–11 onwards. Prior to 2013–14, a different confidentiality technique was used and therefore there may be small differences between historical data presented in the 2013–14 issue onwards and those published in previous issues.
Related publications
ABS publications
Current publications and other products released by the ABS are listed on the ABS website. The ABS also issues a daily Release Advice on the website which details products to be released in the week ahead.
Non-ABS publications
Non-ABS sources of criminal court statistics which may be of interest include:
- ACT Department of Justice and Community Safety, Annual Report
- Australian Institute of Criminology, List of Publications
- Children's Court, Queensland, Annual Report
- Children's Court of Victoria, Annual Report
- Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Annual Report
- County Court of Victoria, Annual Report
- Courts Administration Authority, South Australia, Annual Report
- Department of the Attorney-General and Justice, Northern Territory, Annual Report
- Department of Justice, Western Australia, Annual Report
- Department of Justice and Attorney-General, Queensland, Annual Report
- Department of Justice and Community Safety, Victoria, Annual Report
- Department of Justice, Tasmania, Annual Report
- District Court of Queensland, Annual Report
- District Court of Western Australia, Annual Report
- Department of Justice, New South Wales, Annual Review
- Local Court of New South Wales, Annual Review
- Magistrates' Court of Tasmania, Annual Report
- Magistrates' Court, Queensland, Annual Report
- Magistrates' Court of Victoria, Annual Report
- NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, New South Wales Criminal Courts Statistics
- Attorney-General's Department, South Australia, Publications and Statistics
- Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services
- Queensland Government Statistician's Office, Crime and Justice Statistics, Queensland
- Supreme Court of New South Wales, Annual Review
- Supreme Court of Queensland, Annual Report
- Supreme Court of Tasmania, Annual Report
- Supreme Court of Victoria, Annual Report
- Supreme Court of Western Australia, Annual Report.