|
Feature Article - Expenditure on Land Access for Mineral Exploration, 2001-02
INTRODUCTION
In recent years the level of mineral exploration in Australia has decreased significantly. A number of factors have been suggested for this, including increasing costs associated with access to land for exploration purposes. There are concerns that expenses associated with legislative requirements on native title, environment protection and cultural heritage are adding to the other costs of land access incurred in mineral exploration. For this reason, the issue of the costs of land access has been identified by government and the industry as being an important area for which statistical information is needed.
In 2002, the Ministerial Council on Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MCMPR) through the Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources (DITR) commissioned the ABS to undertake a survey to collect land access expenditure for mineral exploration. The initiative was made possible by a DITR Regional Minerals Program (RMP) grant. The RMP sponsors projects that encourage a coordinated approach by industry and government to facilitate regional mining and mineral processing activities.
The survey was strongly supported by the industry through the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) and the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (Inc.) (AMEC).
Information gained from the survey, which was conducted in respect of 2001-02, will serve to inform the DITR Mineral Exploration Action Agenda process and could support a broader role for the MCMPR in addressing issues associated with land access for mineral exploration.
It should be noted, however, that the survey did not provide any information on how land access expenditure in 2001-02 compared to those in earlier years, so care should be used in relating the results from the survey to changes in total mineral exploration expenditure over time.
The survey was based on a feasibility study completed in October 2001 which investigated the types of land access expenditure that mineral explorers incurred in accessing land for exploration purposes. It also determined the availability of such information in the exploration industry.
In the 2001-02 land access expenditure survey, about 700 private sector businesses were approached with a mailed questionnaire. These businesses were predominantly sourced from the ABS quarterly Mineral Exploration Survey with supplementation from the MCA, AMEC, Geoscience Australia and the Australian Stock Exchange's new and recent listings. The land access expenditure survey was in effect a complete census of mineral exploration undertaken in Australia during 2001-02.
DEFINITION OF LAND ACCESS EXPENDITURE
Land access expenditure includes all 2001-02 financial year expenses incurred in obtaining (or attempting to obtain) access to land for mineral exploration purposes. Expenses may include payments made at the commencement of the exploration cycle (such as exploration licence application fees) through to notification, negotiation, and other processes up to the point where access to land is obtained to physically commence the mineral exploration or attempts to access land have been abandoned. Land access expenditure also includes any on-going payments made in 2001-02 for land access (for mineral exploration purposes) for which an agreement had been made prior to 1 July 2001.
RELATIONSHIP WITH MINERAL EXPLORATION SURVEY
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) conducts a quarterly Survey of Mineral Exploration. Two of the items collected in this survey are mineral exploration expenditure undertaken on 'production leases' and on 'all other areas'. Production leases are areas where production is underway (mine sites) or where development is taking place. All other areas include exploration leases, and in this article they are referred to as 'non-production leases'. Land access expenditure was collected from the 2001-02 survey in respect of exploration in the areas under non-production leases. The comparisons below are therefore related to mineral exploration expenditure in non-production leases as reported in the quarterly Survey of Mineral Exploration.
When determining the contribution of exploration businesses by size, exploration expenditure collected in the Mineral Exploration Survey was used as a proxy measure of business size.
Exploration businesses in the survey were classified into three size groupings by their 2001-02 mineral exploration expenditure in non-production leases. These groupings are:
- large businesses with expenditure of $5m and over
- medium size businesses with expenditure of $1m to less than $5m
- small businesses with expenditure of less than $1m
KEY RESULTS
MAGNITUDE OF LAND ACCESS EXPENDITURE
Mineral exploration land access expenditure amounted to $38.1m in 2001-02. This represented 7.5% of the total mineral exploration expenditure on Australia's non-production leases in 2001-02. On a regional basis, land access expenditure as a proportion of mineral exploration expenditure was highest in Queensland at 9.9%, followed by Northern Territory (8.2%), Western Australia (7.8%), South Australia (7.2%), New South Wales and Tasmania (both with 4.3%) and Victoria (2.3%).
LAND ACCESS AND MINERAL EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE, Non-production leases - 2001-02 |
|
| | | Land access |
| | | expenditure as a |
| | | proportion of |
| Land access | Mineral exploration | mineral exploration |
| expenditure | expenditure | expenditure |
| | | |
| $'000 | $'000 | % |
|
New South Wales | 1,716 | 40,088 | 4.3 |
Victoria | 602 | 26,328 | 2.3 |
Queensland | 6,515 | 65,708 | 9.9 |
South Australia | 2,157 | 29,943 | 7.2 |
Western Australia | 23,771 | 305,233 | 7.8 |
Tasmania | 120 | 2,770 | 4.3 |
Northern Territory | 3,191 | 39,040 | 8.2 |
| | | |
Australia | 38,072 | 509,110 | 7.5 |
|
Western Australia contributed the largest share of Australia's land access expenditure at 62.4% ($23.8m), followed by Queensland with 17.1% ($6.5m). The shares contributed by the remaining states/territory were significantly lower: Northern Territory (8.4%), South Australia (5.7%), New South Wales (4.5%), Victoria (1.6%) and Tasmania (0.3%).
TYPES OF LAND ACCESS EXPENDITURE
Mineral exploration businesses spent a third ($12.6m) of their land access expenditure on native title requirements. Most of this ($8.0m or 63.0%) was incurred on notification, consultation and negotiation expenses.
The second largest land access expense item was government charges ($11.2m or 29.3%). Government charges include application fees, rents and rates incurred by explorers on mineral tenements where access to explore was being negotiated during the 2001-02 financial year.
Cultural heritage expenditure amounted to $5.0m, which was 13.2% of total land access expenditure.
Mineral exploration businesses spent 26.6% of their land access expenditure on tasks outsourced to third parties (other businesses) during 2001-02. The largest expenditure on outsourced tasks was for native title requirements ($4.0m), cultural heritage expenses ($2.5m) and tenement management expenses ($1.7m).
These three items were also significant in terms of expenditure undertaken by the exploration businesses themselves (internal to the business) with expenditure on native title requirements at $8.6m, cultural heritage expenses ($2.5m) and tenement management expenses ($2.4m). However, these internal expenses were each less than expenses for government charges at $10.8m.
LAND ACCESS EXPENDITURE, By nature of expenditure - 2001-02 |
|
| | Internal to the business | | Outsourced to a third party | | Total |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | $'000 | % | | $'000 | % | | $'000 | % |
|
Native title requirements | | | | | | | | |
| Notification, consultation and negotiation expenses | 4,836 | 12.7 | | 3,124 | 8.2 | | 7,960 | 20.9 |
| Compensation expenses | 2,456 | 6.5 | | . . | . . | | 2,456 | 6.5 |
| Community relations expenses | np | np | | np | np | | 2,177 | 5.7 |
| Other expenses | np | np | | np | np | | 39 | 0.1 |
| Total | 8,647 | 22.7 | | 3,985 | 10.5 | | 12,632 | 33.2 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other land-holder consultation and negotiation expenses | 1,310 | 3.4 | | 326 | 0.9 | | 1,636 | 4.3 |
Government charges for tenements where exploration access not yet obtained | 10,816 | 28.4 | | 357 | 0.9 | | 11,173 | 29.3 |
Cultural heritage expenses | 2,543 | 6.7 | | 2,496 | 6.6 | | 5,039 | 13.2 |
Tenement management expenses for tenements where exploration access not yet obtained | 2,383 | 6.3 | | 1,722 | 4.5 | | 4,105 | 10.8 |
Environment and rehabilitation bonds expenses | 1,460 | 3.8 | | 861 | 2.3 | | 2,321 | 6.1 |
Other land access expenses | 782 | 2.1 | | 384 | 1.0 | | 1,166 | 3.1 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 27,941 | 73.4 | | 10,131 | 26.6 | | 38,072 | 100.0 |
|
. . not applicable
np not available for publication but included in totals where applicable, unless otherwise indicated |
LAND ACCESS EXPENDITURE BY BUSINESS SIZE
Large businesses contributed most (39.3%) of the land access expenditure, followed by small businesses (37.0%) and medium size businesses (23.8%).
In analysing the types of land access expenditure by size of business, the results indicate that the larger the business was, the more capable it appeared to be in pursuing land access without assistance from other businesses. Outsourcing accounted for 23.6% of land access expenditure for large businesses, 26.3% for medium size businesses and 30.1% for small businesses.
The data also suggest that larger businesses were more likely to access land subject to native title. For large businesses, expenditure on native title requirements was 47.3% of their total land access expenditure, while for medium size businesses the figure was 29.8% and for small businesses it was 20.3%. Similarly, cultural heritage expenses amounted to 19.7% of total land access expenditure for large businesses, 7.8% for medium size businesses and 9.8% for small businesses.
Government charges were a large proportion of total land access expenditure for small and medium size businesses (38.5% and 37.7% respectively) while for large businesses they represented 15.7% of total land access expenditure.
LAND ACCESS EXPENDITURE, By size of business and nature of expenditure - 2001-02 |
|
| | | SMALL BUSINESSES(a) | | MEDIUM SIZE BUSINESSES(b) |
| | |
| |
|
| | | Internal
to the
business | Outsourced
to a
third party | Total | | Internal
to the
business | Outsourced
to a
third party | Total |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
Native title requirements | | | | | | | |
| Notification, consultation and negotiation expenses | 1,145 | 1,114 | 2,259 | | 845 | 970 | 1,815 |
| Compensation expenses | 481 | . . | 481 | | 664 | . . | 664 |
| Community relations expenses | np | np | 98 | | np | np | np |
| Other expenses | np | np | 25 | | np | np | np |
| Total | 1,740 | 1,123 | 2,863 | | 1,698 | 1,002 | 2,700 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other land-holder consultation and negotiation expenses | 517 | 238 | 755 | | np | np | 454 |
Government charges for tenements where exploration access not yet obtained | 5,104 | 310 | 5,414 | | np | np | 3,412 |
Cultural heritage expenses | 464 | 920 | 1,384 | | 251 | 454 | 705 |
Tenement management expenses for tenements where exploration access not yet obtained | 1,324 | 1,137 | 2,461 | | 469 | 482 | 951 |
Environment and rehabilitation bonds expenses | 315 | 293 | 608 | | 290 | 198 | 488 |
Other land access expenses | 384 | 210 | 594 | | 183 | 156 | 339 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 9,848 | 4,231 | 14,079 | | 6,669 | 2,380 | 9,049 |
|
| | | LARGE BUSINESSES(c) | | ALL BUSINESSES |
| | |
| |
|
| | | Internal
to the
business | Outsourced
to a
third party | Total | | Internal
to the
business | Outsourced
to a
third party | Total |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
Native title requirements | | | | | | | |
| Notification, consultation and negotiation expenses | 2,846 | 1,040 | 3,886 | | 4,836 | 3,124 | 7,960 |
| Compensation expenses | 1,311 | . . | 1,311 | | 2,456 | . . | 2,456 |
| Community relations expenses | np | np | np | | np | np | 2,177 |
| Other expenses | np | np | np | | np | np | 39 |
| Total | 5,209 | 1,860 | 7,069 | | 8,647 | 3,985 | 12,632 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other land-holder consultation and negotiation expenses | np | np | 427 | | 1,310 | 326 | 1,636 |
Government charges for tenements where exploration access not yet obtained | np | np | 2,347 | | 10,816 | 357 | 11,173 |
Cultural heritage expenses | 1,828 | 1,122 | 2,950 | | 2,543 | 2,496 | 5,039 |
Tenement management expenses for tenements where exploration access not yet obtained | 590 | 103 | 693 | | 2,383 | 1,722 | 4,105 |
Environment and rehabilitation bonds expenses | 855 | 370 | 1,225 | | 1,460 | 861 | 2,321 |
Other land access expenses | 215 | 18 | 233 | | 782 | 384 | 1,166 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 11,424 | 3,520 | 14,944 | | 27,941 | 10,131 | 38,072 |
|
. . not applicable
np not available for publication but included in totals where applicable, unless otherwise indicated
(a) Small businesses are those with exploration expenditure less than $1m.
(b) Medium size businesses are those with exploration expenditure of $1m but less than $5m.
(c) Large businesses are those with exploration expenditure of $5m or more. |
FURTHER INFORMATION
In addition to the above statistical information, the ABS has derived statistics on land access expenditure by types of minerals sought for 2001-02. This information can be made available on request. For this information and any other information about expenditure on land access for mineral exploration 2001-02, contact Ashley Heddle on Canberra 02 6252 7808.
|