Page tools: Print Page Print All | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TECHNICAL NOTE 1 METHODOLOGY
7 ABN units: The balance of units on the ABSBR classified to manufacturing were ABN units, from the ATO maintained population. 8 An indication of the importance of these populations to the data can be gained from their contribution to the national estimate of sales and service income for Total Manufacturing. The following table shows their proportional contributions to sales and service income.
COLLECTION DESIGN 9 In order to decrease the statistical reporting load placed on providers while maintaining the range and quality of information available to users of statistical data, the strategy for this survey was to adopt the use of directly collected data from a smaller sample of businesses, in combination with information sourced from the ATO. The frame (from which the direct collect sample was selected) was stratified using information held on the ABS Business Register. Businesses eligible for selection in the direct collect sample were then selected from the frame using stratified random sampling techniques. 10 Businesses were selected to participate in the survey (the direct collect sample) only if they met two criteria: their turnover exceeded a threshold level and the business was identified as having been an employing business (based on ATO information) during the reference period. Turnover thresholds were set for each ANZSIC class so that the contribution of surveyed businesses accounted for 97.5% of total industry class turnover as determined by ATO Business Activity Statement data. 11 Businesses which met neither of these criteria are referred to as 'micro non-employing businesses'. These businesses were not eligible for selection in the sample. For these units, BAS data were obtained and annualised, then added to the directly collected estimates to produce the statistics in this publication. The total estimated value of annual turnover of micro non-employing manufacturing businesses during the 2006-07 reference year, as determined by ATO Business Activity Statement data, was $2.5b. ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY 12 Estimates from previous iterations of this survey were produced using number raised estimation methodology. The 2006-07 survey used generalised regression estimation.This estimation method enables maximum use of observed linear relationships between data directly collected from businesses in the survey and auxiliary information. When the auxiliary information is strongly correlated with data items collected in a survey, the generalised regression estimation methodology will improve the accuracy of the estimates. The auxiliary variables used in this survey were turnover and wages sourced from ATO Business Activity Statement data. PRODUCING ESTIMATES 13 The following diagram illustrates the ways in which Australian businesses contribute to the estimates in this publication. DATA STREAMING 14 For the purpose of compiling the estimates in this publication, data for businesses as recorded on the ABSBR contribute via one of three categories (or 'streams') in accordance with significance and collection-related characteristics. Completely Enumerated (CE) Stream: 15 The CE stream consists of directly collected survey data for those units recorded on the ABSBR as having employment greater than 300, plus additional 'significant' units in the ABS maintained population and units significant to small state estimates. Generalised regression (GREG) estimation Stream: 16 The GREG stream comprises directly collected data for those sampled units which are not in the CE stream and have turnover, in aggregate, above the bottom 2.5 percentile of BAS sales for that industry. The accuracy of the estimates produced from this data is then improved by using wages and turnover data sourced from businesses' BAS data. Business Activity Statement (BAS) Stream: 17 The BAS stream comprises data for those businesses in the ATO maintained population whose turnover, in aggregate, is below the bottom 2.5 percentile of BAS sales for that industry. 18 Estimates for each of the selected industries were produced by aggregating the contributing data streams. STATE ESTIMATES 19 Estimates of state data in this survey were produced using data from pre-identified sample selections that operated in more than one state. All other sampled units had all their reported data allocated to their main state of operation. EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES 20 One implication of the use of BAS data in these statistics is that no direct measure of employment is available for those units which contribute to the estimates solely through the BAS source. This is because the ATO does not collect information about employment numbers. Unlike financial variables, which have a direct relationship to the data available from the BAS files, employment data are not amenable to being modelled using the same techniques. Hence a different methodology is used in order to estimate employment for those units whose data are sourced solely from the BAS files. For each such business, the number of employees is assumed to be zero. For each unincorporated business an estimate of its number of working proprietors or partners is used as the estimate of its total employment. These estimates are then aggregated to the directly collected data to produce the estimates in this publication. EMPLOYMENT SIZE ESTIMATES 21 For consistency, employment size estimates in table 2.3 have been presented using identical size categories as in previous issues. A result of the methodological changes introduced in 2006-07 is that the stratification boundaries no longer align as closely with these size ranges. The cut off for completely enumerated (CE) businesses was for any business with employment of 50 or more persons. This meant that employment size categories for 50 and above persons employed were CE'd and had the associated level of precision. The cut off for CE'd units in the 2006-07 survey was units with employment of 300 or more persons which meant sampling variability was introduced for units above 49 persons employed that was not present before. The sample stratification boundaries for sampled units also changed in 2006-07 and the correlation to existing size boundaries is not as strong as in previous years. As a consequence the relative standard errors (RSE) for employment size will be higher than previously. The RSE's can be made available on request. HISTORICAL ESTIMATES 22 Data collected for 2004-05 and 2005-06 (under ANZSIC93) have been updated to take account of any revisions to the data since they were published in the previous issue of this publication. The data so revised have then been mapped to ANZSIC06, and further adjusted to incorporate the scope changes outlined in Explanatory Notes paragraph 9 and the methodological changes discussed in this chapter. This process is known as 'bridging' and was used to create the key data items presented in Table 1.1. Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window.
|