WHEN IS THE MEAN NOT A USEFUL MEASURE?
The mean is a good choice of measure of central tendency when the data is more or less symmetrically spread out from the lowest to highest values. However, the mean is not a good measure when the data is unevenly spread.
Let us take the case above, but this time change the CEO's earnings to $200,000.
Using the formula again:
![Equation: Mean](/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/2f762f95845417aeca25706c00834efa/56fce541b8695189ca2574740015ae43/Body/0.2E2!OpenElement&FieldElemFormat=gif)
The mean income of these nine employees has increased to $66,666.
Given that only one of the nine employees earns above this amount, the mean is not a good measure of where the midpoint lies.
This is demonstrated in the diagram below.
In this case a much better measure of the midpoint would be the
median.