Australian Bureau of Statistics
5625.0 - Private New Capital Expenditure and Expected Expenditure, Australia, Sep 2009 Quality Declaration
Previous ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 26/11/2009
|Page tools: Print Page Print All RSS Search this Product|
FEATURE ARTICLE: THE APPLICATION OF REALISATION RATIOS TO THE SURVEY OF NEW CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Five Year Average Projected Time Series, Equipment
Five Year Average Projected Time Series, Building
Firstly it is noticeable that the equipment series is generally more volatile than the building series. This may be due to the ability of firms to adjust investment levels for equipment at a more rapid pace than those of building, which are generally more long-term plans. The result is that building expectations are less responsive to short term changes in economic conditions and that even if actual investment in building changes, the change in expectations may take longer to flow through.
BEHAVIOUR OF REALISATION RATIOS IN PERIODS OF RAPID ECONOMIC CHANGE
Looking closer at the behaviour of the realisation ratios, and more specifically the five year average, it is evident that there is a significant issue that arises when the economy undergoes significant change. This is noticeable with a specific examination of rapid decline and rapid growth periods of an economy as seen in the graphs below, which are excerpts from the graphs seen previously.
Equipment - Five Year Average Projected Time Series, Period of Decline
Building - Five Year Average Projected Time Series, Period of Growth
Firstly it is clear that there is an identifiable lag when realisation ratios from both the previous year or a five-year average are applied. This highlights the problem of predicting future outcomes using historical data which may no longer be relevant or appropriate. However it is noted that, as expected, the single year series does react quicker to the change. Furthermore, at least with the rapid economic decline seen in the equipment series, when the effects of the economic downturn began to flow through, as seen in the decline in Estimate 7, the forecast for both the single and five year average series' actually increased at an increasing rate.
The outcomes seen during these periods of rapid change in the economy suggest that by applying a five-year average realisation ratio, the turning points of an economy will be distorted and smoothed over. Therefore the usefulness of this method for forecasting future capital expenditure is severely limited during a period of change in the economy.
This graph also reveals another factor which impacts the effectiveness of the five-year average. The five-year average is often under the influence of significant patterns of activity which do not necessarily represent an accurate picture of the current overall conditions of the economy. For example, this current five-year average is heavily influenced by the rapid growth and relatively above average realisation ratios of the Mining industry during the period of 2004/05 to 2006/07, particularly evident in the building series.
This period of very high realisation ratios would be strongly contributing to the five-year realisation ratios predicting continued growth in investment in the next couple of financial years. This example of the Mining Industry shows the impact of a 2-3 year period of extreme growth, or decline, in realisation ratios on five-year averaged estimates. This again reflects on the underlying issue that using potentially unrelated and misleading historical data, which may provide little or no insight into future plans, will not provide reliable results in times of economic change.
Realisation Ratio Industry Comparison - Estimate 1, Building
An examination of these two end points in an economic cycle would certainly seem to reveal the inherent problem with five year average realisation ratios. That is during periods of significant economic change, they are unreliable and often provide results which are significantly wrong.
Furthermore this problem is cyclical in that it is prevalent at both the start and finish of an economic cycle. A five-year average is sufficient, and even reliable during periods of moderate growth in investment. However, when under going rapid change in investment they are actually misleading.
In summary, an average of the previous 5 years’ pattern of capital expenditure realisation of expected expenditure is not considered a sound approach to projecting future capital expenditure when the economy has experienced a significant shift in the economic cycle, with a specific emphasis in an event such as a turning point.
It is considered a better approach to provide the user community with a full history of available capital expenditure realisation ratios and for users to determine which realisation ratios or multiple term average realisation ratio may be suitable for projection of future actual capital expenditure, in a given economic context.
This step has been taken with the inclusion from July 2009 of two additional tables on the ABS web site which feature time series of these statistics back to the first available data. These tables are titled:
Data for all realisation ratios and seven estimates is in Current Prices, Original.
These documents will be presented in a new window.
This page last updated 24 November 2010