Australian Bureau of Statistics

Rate the ABS website
ABS Home > Statistics > By Catalogue Number
ABS @ Facebook ABS @ Twitter ABS RSS ABS Email notification service
1249.0 - Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups (ASCCEG), 2011  
Latest ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 16/08/2011   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All RSS Feed RSS Bookmark and Share Search this Product

INDEX FOR CODING RESPONSES


WHY WE USE A CODING INDEX

Responses provided in statistical and administrative collections do not always precisely reflect classification categories. A coding index is therefore necessary to act as a link between responses and the classification, enabling responses to be assigned accurately and quickly to the appropriate category of the classification.


HOW THE INDEX WAS DEVELOPED

The coding index has been developed to assist in the implementation and use of the classification and should be used when coding administrative data and responses to questions relating to ancestry, ethnicity and cultural diversity. The coding index has been devised by reference to existing literature in the field; consultation with academics, experts, government and private organisations with ethnicity knowledge and expertise, and ethnic and community groups; and by analysis of existing ABS data. It contains a comprehensive list of the most probable responses to questions relating to ethnicity, cultural background and ancestry and their correct classification codes.

The coding index includes many cultural and ethnic groups that are not separately identified in the classification structure but which are included in the residual nec category of the narrow group to which they relate. In addition to its coding function, the index can therefore be used to clarify the nature, extent and varietal content of each classification category.

The coding index as at 16 August 2011 is included in the ASCCEG data cube.


CODING RULES

As previously noted the classification is not intended to classify people, but rather to classify all claims of association with a cultural or ethnic group. In developing the coding index for ASCCEG a number of rules were followed in assigning index entries the correct classification code. It is recommended that these rules be adhered to when coding any response that does not appear in the coding index provided.

Many people identify with more than one cultural or ethnic group and will give multiple responses to a question on ancestry, ethnicity or cultural identity. Often a response indicates an identification with a country in a national or cultural sense and also acknowledges continuing ties with other ethnic or cultural groups. These responses should be assigned codes for both categories they relate to. Sometimes a response will give the ethnicity and ancestry of both parents or all grandparents. If meaningful and useful data is to be collected, stored and disseminated, as many as possible of the cultural and ethnic groups nominated by a person on a statistical or administrative form should be coded. It is suggested that a minimum of two cultural and ethnic groups be coded if a multiple response is given. This will improve the accuracy and usefulness of data.

When coding responses in statistical, administrative or service delivery collections, the following rules should be applied:

  • responses which match exactly with an entry in the coding index are assigned the code allocated to that index entry
  • responses which have a partial match with an entry in the coding index and only differ in terms of alternative spelling, the use of abbreviations or acronyms, or the use of foreign or idiosyncratic words, etc. are assigned the code allocated to that index entry
  • responses which have a partial match with an entry in the coding index and only differ in terms of qualifying or extraneous words are assigned the code allocated to that index entry
  • responses which do not match with an index entry or relate to a separately identified cultural and ethnic group in the classification are assigned a residual (nec) category code, or a supplementary (nfd) code
  • responses which are not precise enough to be coded to any category should be assigned the appropriate 'inadequately described' code
  • when coding what appear to be multiple responses, if all the words appearing in the response appear in a single index entry, assign the code listed and
  • when coding what appear to be multiple responses, if all the words appearing in a response do not appear in a single index entry, assign a code for each word representing a cultural or ethnic group that does appear in the index.



Bookmark and Share. Opens in a new window

Commonwealth of Australia 2014

Unless otherwise noted, content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia Licence together with any terms, conditions and exclusions as set out in the website Copyright notice. For permission to do anything beyond the scope of this licence and copyright terms contact us.