Australian Bureau of Statistics

Rate the ABS website
ABS Home > Statistics > By Catalogue Number
ABS @ Facebook ABS @ Twitter ABS RSS ABS Email notification service
8146.0 - Household Use of Information Technology, Australia, 2012-13 Quality Declaration 
Latest ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 25/02/2014   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All RSS Feed RSS Bookmark and Share Search this Product

INTRODUCTION

1 This release presents results for Household Use of Information Technology (HUIT) collected from the Multipurpose Household Survey (MPHS) for 2012–13 by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

2 The MPHS is conducted each year as a supplement to the monthly Labour Force Survey (LFS) and is designed to collect statistics for a number of small, self-contained topics. In 2012–13 these topics were:

  • Household use of information technology
  • Crime victimisation
  • Family characteristics and family transitions and history
  • Patient experience
  • Barriers and incentives to labour force participation
  • Retirement and retirement intentions.
3 Data for the other MPHS topics collected in 2012–13 are released in separate publications.

4 The publication Labour Force, Australia (cat. no. 6202.0) contains information about survey design, sample redesign, scope, coverage and population benchmarks relevant to the monthly Labour Force Survey (LFS), which also apply to supplementary surveys. It also contains definitions of demographic and labour force characteristics, and information about telephone interviewing relevant to both the monthly LFS and supplementary surveys.

DATA COLLECTION

5 The MPHS is conducted as a supplement to the monthly LFS. Each month one eighth of the LFS sample is rotated out of the survey and a portion of these dwellings are selected for the MPHS. From July to November 2012, approximately 85% of this outgoing rotation group were selected for inclusion in the MPHS sample. From December 2012 to June 2013, this proportion increased to 100%. In these dwellings, after the LFS had been fully completed for each person in scope and coverage, a person (usual resident) aged 15 years or over was selected at random (based on a computer algorithm) and asked the MPHS questions in a personal interview. If the randomly selected person was aged 15 to 17 years, permission was sought from a parent or guardian before the interview. If permission was not given, the parent or guardian was asked the questions on behalf of the 15 to 17 year old (i.e. as a proxy respondent). Where applicable, questions about perceptions or attitudes were not asked in these situations.

6 Data was collected using Computer Assisted Interviewing, whereby responses were recorded directly onto an electronic questionnaire in a notebook computer usually during a telephone interview.

HISTORICAL COMPARISONS

7 Due to the difference in the scope of previous surveys, HUIT data from the 2005–06 MPHS onwards (the scope of which is persons aged 15 years and over) are not directly comparable with data from previous years, which was limited to persons aged 18 years and over.

DATA PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED IN HUIT

8 In previous years, internet use data collected via the Survey of Children's Participation in Culture and Leisure Activities (CPCLA) and the Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) have been included in the HUIT release. To reduce the duplication, these data now only appear in the respective survey publications. Recently released data can be found in:
SCOPE AND COVERAGE

9 The MPHS is conducted each year throughout Australia from July to June as a supplement to the ABS' monthly LFS. The scope of the LFS is restricted to people aged 15 years and over and excludes the following:
    • members of the permanent defence forces
    • certain diplomatic personnel of overseas governments, customarily excluded from census and estimated resident populations
    • overseas residents in Australia
    • members of non-Australian defence forces (and their dependants)
    10 In addition the MPHS excludes the following from its scope:
    • people living in Indigenous Communities in very remote parts of Australia
    • people living in non-private dwellings such as hotels, university residences, students at boarding schools, patients in hospitals, inmates of prisons and residents of other institutions (e.g. retirement homes, homes for persons with disabilities).

    11 The LFS applies coverage rules that aim to ensure each person is associated with only one dwelling and hence has only one chance of selection in the survey. MPHS coverage rules are the same as those for the monthly LFS with the exception that people living in Indigenous Communities in very remote areas were not enumerated for operational reasons. Nationally, less than 1% of people in-scope of the MPHS live in Indigenous Communities in very remote areas. The majority are in Northern Territory where approximately 16% of the in-scope population are in very remote Indigenous Communities.

    SAMPLE SIZE

    12 The initial sample for the household use of information technology topic was 23,016 private dwellings, from which one randomly selected person per household was asked about their household's access to (and their own use of) the internet. Of the 19,632 private dwellings that remained in the survey after sample loss, 15,433 private dwellings (79%) fully responded to the questions on the household use of information technology.

    WEIGHTING, ESTIMATION AND BENCHMARKING

    13 Weighting is the process of adjusting data from a sample survey to infer data for the total in-scope population. To do this a 'weight' is allocated to each sample unit, which can be either a person or a household for the MPHS. The weight is a value which indicates how many population units are represented by the sample unit. For the MPHS, the first step in calculating weights for each unit was to assign an initial weight, which is the inverse of the probability of being selected in the survey. For example, if the probability of a person being selected in the survey was 1 in 600, then the person would have an initial weight of 600 (i.e. they represent 600 people). The initial weights were then calibrated to align with independent estimates of the population of interest, referred to as benchmarks.

    14 The 2012–13 survey was benchmarked to the projected civilian population aged 15 years and over, living in private dwellings in each state and territory. The process of weighting ensures that the survey estimates conform to person benchmarks by state, part of state, age and sex, and to household benchmarks by state, part of state and household composition. These benchmarks are produced from estimates of the resident population derived independently of the survey. The estimation procedure ensures estimates of persons calibrate exactly to independently produced population totals at broad levels. The known population totals are produced according to the scope of the survey. The same is true for estimates of households produced in this survey. However, in these cases the household benchmarks are actually estimates themselves as this population is not known.

    15 The person benchmarks used for the 2012–13 MPHS were based on the projected population for March 2013. These benchmarks were based on the published figures for the December 2012 quarter (Australian Demographic Statistics, Dec 2012 (cat. no. 3101.0)). Therefore, the benchmarks used in this survey will differ slightly from the actual estimates produced for the March 2013 quarter.

    INCOME LESS THAN ZERO

    16 Some households reported negative income in the survey. This is possible if they incur losses in their unincorporated business or have negative returns from their investments. Studies of income and expenditure from the Household Expenditure Survey, Australia (cat. no. 6530.0) have shown that such households in the bottom income decile and with negative gross incomes tend to have expenditure levels that are comparable with those of households with higher income levels (and slightly above the average expenditures recorded for the fifth decile), indicating that these households have access to economic resources, such as wealth, or that the instance of low or negative income is temporary, perhaps reflecting business or investment start-up.

    EQUIVALISED HOUSEHOLD INCOME

    17 Equivalence scales are used to adjust the actual incomes of households in a way that enables the analysis of the relative wellbeing of people living in households of different size and composition. For example, it would be expected that a household comprising two people would normally need more income than a lone person household, if all the people in the two households are to enjoy the same material standards of living. Adopting a per capita analysis would address one aspect of household size difference, but would address neither compositional difference (i.e. the number of adults compared with the number of children) nor the economies derived from living together.

    18 When household income is adjusted according to an equivalence scale, the equivalised income can be viewed as an indicator of the economic resources available to a standardised household. For a lone person household, it is equal to income received. For a household comprising more than one person, equivalised income is an indicator of the household income that would be required by a lone person household in order to enjoy the same level of economic wellbeing as the household in question.

    19 The equivalence scale used in this publication was developed for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and is referred to as the "modified OECD" equivalence scale. It is widely accepted among Australian analysts of income distribution.

    20 The scale allocates 1.0 point for the first adult (aged 15 years or older) in a household; 0.5 for each additional adult; and 0.3 for each child. Equivalised household income is derived by dividing total household income by the sum of the equivalence points allocated to household members. For example, if a household received combined gross income of $2,100 per week and comprised two adults and two children (combined household equivalence points of 2.1), the equivalised gross household income for each household member would be calculated as $1,000 per week.

    21 For more information on the use of equivalence scales, see Household Income and Income Distribution, Australia (cat. no. 6523.0).

    EQUIVALISED HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILES

    22 These are groupings of 20% of the total population when ranked in ascending order according to equivalised household income. The population used for this purpose includes all people living in private dwellings, including children and other persons under the age of 15 years. As the scope of this publication is restricted to only those persons aged 15 years and over, the distribution of this smaller population across the quintiles is not necessarily the same as it is for persons of all ages, i.e. the percentage of persons aged 15 years and over in each of these quintiles may be larger or smaller than 20%.

    CLASSIFICATIONS USED

    23 Country of birth data are classified according to the Standard Australian Classification of Countries (SACC), 2011 (cat. no. 1269.0).

    24 Educational attainment is classified according to Australian Standard Classification of Education (ASCED), 2001 (cat. no. 1272.0).

    25 Occupation data are classified according to the ANZSCO - Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations, Version 1.2, 2013 (cat. no. 1220.0).

    26 Remoteness Areas and Section of State (SOS) are classified according to the Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC), July 2011 (cat. no. 1216.0).

    27 In each state, Urban includes the SOS categories of:

    • 0 - Major Urban: urban areas with a population of 100,000 and over; and
    • 1 - Other Urban: urban areas with a population of 1,000 to 99,999.
    28 Rural includes the SOS categories of:
    • 2 - Bounded Locality: small towns with a population of 200 to 999; and
    • 3 - Rural balance .
    EFFECTS OF ROUNDING

    29 Estimates have been rounded and discrepancies may occur between sums of the component items and totals.

    COMPARABILITY WITH MONTHLY LFS STATISTICS

    30 Due to differences in the scope and sample size of the MPHS and that of the LFS, the estimation procedure may lead to some small variations between labour force estimates from this survey and those from the LFS.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    31 ABS publications draw extensively on information provided freely by individuals, businesses, governments and other organisations. Their continued cooperation is very much appreciated. Without it, the wide range of statistics published by the ABS would not be available. Information received by the ABS is treated in strict confidence as required by the Census and Statistics Act 1905.

    RELATED PUBLICATIONS

    32 Other ABS publications on the production and use of information and communication technologies and telecommunication goods and services in Australia are:
    33 Publications and other products to be released within the next six months by the ABS are listed in the ABS release calendar. The calendar is available from the ABS website <http://www.abs.gov.au>.

    ABS DATA AVAILABLE ON REQUEST

    34
    As well as statistics included in this and related publications, the ABS may have other relevant data available on request. Inquiries should be made to the National Information Referral Service on 1300 135 070.


    Bookmark and Share. Opens in a new window

    Commonwealth of Australia 2014

    Unless otherwise noted, content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia Licence together with any terms, conditions and exclusions as set out in the website Copyright notice. For permission to do anything beyond the scope of this licence and copyright terms contact us.