1269.0 - Standard Australian Classification of Countries (SACC), 2011
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 22/08/2011
|Page tools: Print Page Print All|
The theoretical and conceptual considerations for developing the structure of the classification were applied in conjunction with other considerations including:
Physical and statistical balance
The classification was developed to achieve a structure that is physically and statistically balanced. This is necessary to allow the classification to fulfil its functions in a way that is useful and practical for presenting and analysing statistical data, especially from sample surveys.
Physical balance was achieved by developing a classification that at a particular level within each category has:
Statistical balance means that each major and minor group should represent a significant number of observations. But no major or minor group should represent an excessive number of observations (say, Country of Birth responses). Consequently, a classification used for the dissemination of statistics should not have categories at the same level in its hierarchy which are too different in their population size. This allows the classification to be used effectively for the cross-tabulation of aggregate data and the dissemination of data from sample surveys.
Application of the classification criteria, generally led to a balanced classification structure. However, considerations of practicality, usefulness and statistical balance were also used in developing the structure including:
CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA AND THEIR APPLICATION
Classification criteria are the principles by which categories are aggregated to form broader categories in a classification structure.
The criteria used for the SACC are:
Geographic proximity is the basic criterion used to group countries in the SACC. The principle allows for the grouping of countries which may be separated by bodies of water.
Similarity in terms of social and cultural characteristics is based primarily on language spoken in a group of countries. However, other factors such as religion practised, historical links, similarity of national aspirations, and even factors such as type of food, or similarity of art, serve as indicators of cultural and social similarity.
Grouping countries to form minor groups
The lowest level of the classification consists of separately identified countries. Neighbouring countries are combined to form the minor groups of the classification structure on the basis of similar social, cultural, economic and political characteristics.
In some cases countries which do not have neighbouring borders are grouped together because of similar characteristics.
As well as being geographically proximate, the countries of minor groups must all lie within a single geographic continent. Although the countries in a minor group are not necessarily identical in respect of any particular characteristic, the groups formed are relatively homogeneous in terms of the set of classification criteria.
While geographic proximity is the principal criterion used in grouping countries, in instances where a country could fit into more than one minor group on the basis of its location, its placement in the classification is made primarily on the basis of its characteristics and those of its neighbours.
Where a country could fit equally into more than one minor group based on all the classification criteria, it is classified on factors such as practicality, usefulness, and statistical balance between groups.
Grouping minor groups to form major groups
Major groups were formed by aggregating minor groups. Minor groups were selected to comprise a Major group based on their geographic proximity and their similarities in social, cultural, economic and political characteristics.
In principle, major groups are formed so that they lie entirely within a single geographic continent.
This is not the case for two major groups:
The countries of North Africa are included in a major group with the Middle East because of their social and cultural similarities. To include them in a group with Sub-Saharan countries from which they are geographically, environmentally and culturally removed would not be in harmony with the principles of the classification or useful for social and population statistics. In many economic statistics, however, the continental classification of Africa and Asia is appropriate and is adopted as an output view of the data.
The classification criteria and the way they have been applied has produced a classification structure that consists of:
ABOUT THE CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
The classification is a hierarchy with three levels.
The third level of the classification structure consists of 255 countries including four residual ('not elsewhere classified') categories. Residual codes are explained in 'About codes'.
The second level of the classification structure comprises 27 minor groups. Each minor group lies wholly within the boundaries of a geographic continent.
The first level of the classification structure comprises nine major groups, formed by aggregating geographically proximate minor groups. Major groups comprise countries which have broadly similar social, cultural, economic and political characteristics.
Most major groups lie wholly within the bounds of a single geographic continent. There are two exceptions: 'North Africa and the Middle East', and 'Americas'.
These documents will be presented in a new window.