APPENDIX 5: PREDICTORS FOR BEING OUT OF THE LABOUR FORCE
IDENTIFYING PREDICTORS FOR BEING OUT OF THE LABOUR FORCE
Logit model was used to identify the factors underlying labour force participation. The probability of a person being out of the labour force was modelled as a function of individual and household characteristics.
The data used for the analysis was from the 2014–15 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey. The sample comprised Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons aged 15–64 years. Replicate weights were used to maintain the representativeness of the sample.
Average marginal effects are reported instead of coefficients, as they are easy to interpret. The average marginal effect measures the change in the probability of a person being out of the labour force when the value of an independent variable changes by a unit. For example, if the value given for sex is 1 when female and 0 when male, the average marginal effect associated with sex is computed as follows:
1. Treat the person as though they were female, regardless of what the person’s sex actually is. Leave the value of all the other independent variables as they are (see Table 1.1 below for the full list of variables included in the modelling).
2. Compute the probability that this person (if she were female) would be out of the labour force.
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 but this time as if the person were male.
4. Take the difference between the two predicted probabilities. The difference just computed is the marginal effect for one individual.
5. Repeat steps 1, 2 and 3 for everyone in the sample.
6. Compute the average of all the marginal effects.
Average marginal effects are expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A negative average marginal effect means the probability of being out of the labour force falls as the value of the variable increases. A positive average marginal effect means the probability of not being in the labour force rises as the value of the variable increases. In this example, the positive average marginal effect for sex is 0.149, which means the probability of being out of the labour force is higher for females than males. For the sake of interpretation, the estimated value of the average marginal effect (0.149) should be multiplied by 100 (0.149*100) and expressed in percentage points (15 percentage points).
Given that our model included more than one predictor variable, when we interpret the marginal effect associated with sex, we assume that two randomly chosen individuals in the sample have the same characteristics (as represented by the variables included in the model) except one of them is male and the other is female. Then we say ‘For the same age, social marital status, level of education, long-term health condition, disability status, etc, females are on average 15 percentage points more likely than males to be out of the labour force’. For the sake of brevity, we can also say ‘Females are 15 percentage points more likely than males to be out of the labour force’. The marginal effects associated with the other predictor variables should be interpreted in a similar way.
VARIABLES USED FOR IDENTIFYING PREDICTORS FOR BEING OUT OF THE LABOUR FORCE
The following table indicates which variables were used when estimating average marginal effects.
Table 1.1 Variables used for identifying predictors for not being in the labour force
| | |
| | |
|
Variable | Categories | |
|
Labour force status | 1
0 | Not in the labour force (reference)
In the labour force |
| | |
Sex | 1
0 | Female (reference)
Male |
| | |
Age | | Continuous variable taking values in the range of 15 to 64 years |
| | |
Age squared | | Continuous variable |
| | |
Remoteness | 1
0 | Lives in remote area (reference)
Lives in non-remote area |
| | |
Social marital status | 1
0 | Not living in a couple relationship (reference)
Living in a couple relationship |
| | |
Dependent children | 1
0 | Lives in a family with dependent child/ren (reference)
Lives in a family with no dependent child/ren |
| | |
Household size | | Continuous variable taking values in the range of 1 to 10(a) |
| | |
Main language spoken at home | 1
0 | An Australian Indigenous language (reference)
English |
| | |
Lives on homelands | 1
0 | Lives on homelands/traditional country (reference)
Does not live on or does not recognise homelands/traditional country |
| | |
Participation in cultural activities | 1
0 | Did not participate in selected cultural activities in last 12 months(b) (reference)
Participated in selected cultural activities |
| | |
Involved in cultural events | 1
0 | Involved in selected events, ceremonies or organisations in last 12 months(c) (reference)
Not involved in selected events, ceremonies or organisations |
| | |
Diagnosed with long-term health condition | 1
0 | Diagnosed with a long-term health condition (reference)
Not diagnosed with a long-term health condition |
| | |
Disability status | 1
0 | Has profound/severe/moderate/mild core activity limitation or a schooling/employment restriction (reference)
Has no specific limitation or disability |
| | |
Social contact | 1
0 | Participated in selected sporting, social or community activities (reference)
Did not participate in selected sporting, social or community activities |
| | |
Carer | 1
0 | Did not care for a person with disability, long-term health condition or old age in last four weeks (reference)
Cared for a person with disability, long-term health condition or old age |
| | |
Social support | 1
0 | Able to get support in time of crisis from outside household (reference)
Not able to get support |
| | |
Unfair treatment | 1
0 | Has not had unfair treatment in last 12 months because Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (reference)
Has had unfair treatment |
| | |
Transportation | 1
0 | Can't get to/sometimes or often have difficulty getting to places needed (reference)
Can easily get to places needed |
| | |
Household financial resources | 1
2
3 | Household members could raise $2,000 in an emergency in a week (reference)
Household members could not raise $2,000 in a week
Not known if could raise $2,000 in a week |
| | |
Incarceration | 1
0 | Has been incarcerated in lifetime (reference)
Has never been incarcerated |
| | |
Education level(d) | 1
2
3
4
5 | Year 12 (reference)
Year 9 or below
Year 10 or 11
Advanced diploma/diploma/Certificate III/IV
Bachelor degree or higher |
| | |
Studying | 1
0 | Not currently studying (reference)
Currently studying |
|
(a) The value 10 represents a household size of 10 or more people. (b) Includes fished, hunted, gathered wild plants/berries, made Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander arts or crafts, performed any Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander music, dance or theatre, and written or told any Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander stories. (c) Includes funerals/sorry business, NAIDOC week activities, sports carnivals (excluding NAIDOC week activities), and festivals or carnivals involving arts, crafts, music or dance (excluding NAIDOC week activities). (d) Highest level of educational attainment.
RESULTS OF MODELLING
The following tables provide the average marginal effects and percentage point differences for all people aged 15–64 years (Table 1.2), by sex (Table 1.3) and by remoteness (Table 1.4).
Table 1.2 shows the average marginal effect associated with remoteness is not statistically significant. This implies that living in a non-remote or remote area is not significantly associated with labour force participation (based on the characteristics included in the model). From a methodological perspective, it makes little sense to then split the sample into non-remote and remote areas. However, from a policy perspective, we are not only interested in the effect of remoteness by itself. We are also interested in identifying the factors underlying not being in the labour force within non-remote and remote areas, and in whether the importance of those factors varies by remoteness. For this reason, we have split the sample into non-remote and remote and run separate regressions, the results of which are in Table 1.4.
Table 1.2 Predictors for not being in the labour force, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons aged 15–64 years
|
| Total persons |
|
|
Variable | Average marginal effect | Percentage point difference | Standard error |
|
Sex | 0.149(a) | 14.9(a) | 0.021 |
| | | |
Age | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.001 |
| | | |
Remoteness | 0.022 | 2.2 | 0.025 |
| | | |
Social marital status | 0.109(a) | 10.9(a) | 0.022 |
| | | |
Dependent children | 0.043 | 4.3 | 0.028 |
| | | |
Household size | 0.012 | 1.2 | 0.008 |
| | | |
Main language spoken at home | 0.048 | 4.8 | 0.031 |
| | | |
Lives on homelands | 0.023 | 2.3 | 0.021 |
| | | |
Participation in cultural activities | 0.023 | 2.3 | 0.024 |
| | | |
Involved in cultural events | -0.026 | -2.6 | 0.026 |
| | | |
Diagnosed with long-term health condition | 0.040 | 4.0 | 0.024 |
| | | |
Disability status | 0.174(a) | 17.4(a) | 0.026 |
| | | |
Social contact | 0.079 | 7.9 | 0.063 |
| | | |
Carer | 0.038 | 3.8 | 0.022 |
| | | |
Social support | -0.032 | -3.2 | 0.040 |
| | | |
Unfair treatment | 0.047(a) | 4.7(a) | 0.021 |
| | | |
Transportation | 0.070(a) | 7.0(a) | 0.025 |
| | | |
Household financial resources | | | |
| | | |
Could not raise $2,000 in a week | 0.124(a) | 12.4(a) | 0.025 |
| | | |
Unsure if could raise $2,000 in a week | 0.113(a) | 11.3(a) | 0.051 |
| | | |
Incarceration | 0.157(a) | 15.7(a) | 0.037 |
| | | |
Education level(b) | | | |
| | | |
Year 9 or below | 0.138(a) | 13.8(a) | 0.038 |
| | | |
Year 10 or 11 | 0.081(a) | 8.1(a) | 0.038 |
| | | |
Advanced diploma/diploma/Certificate III/IV | -0.071(a) | -7.1(a) | 0.035 |
| | | |
Bachelor degree or higher | -0.181(a) | -18.1(a) | 0.050 |
| | | |
Studying | 0.017 | 1.7 | 0.031 |
|
|
Number of observations | | 4 620 |
|
(a) Statistically significant at the 5% level. (b) Highest level of educational attainment.
Table 1.3 Predictors for not being in the labour force by sex, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons aged 15–64 years
(a) Statistically significant at the 5% level. (b) Highest level of educational attainment.
Table 1.4 Predictors for not being in the labour force by remoteness, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons aged 15–64 years
(a) Statistically significant at the 5% level. (b) Highest level of educational attainment.