4229.0 - Adult Learning, Australia, 2006-07  
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 21/12/2007  First Issue
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

TECHNICAL NOTE DATA QUALITY


RELIABILITY OF THE ESTIMATES

1 Since the estimates in this publication are based on information obtained from occupants of a sample of dwellings, they are subject to sampling variability. That is, they may differ from those estimates that would have been produced if all occupants of all dwellings had been included in the survey. One measure of the likely difference is given by the standard error (SE), which indicates the extent to which an estimate might have varied by chance because only a sample of dwellings (or occupants) was included. There are about two chances in three (67%) that a sample estimate will differ by less than one SE from the number that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included, and about 19 chances in 20 (95%) that the difference will be less than two SEs.


2 Another measure of the likely difference is the relative standard error (RSE), which is obtained by expressing the SE as a percentage of the estimate:


Equation: This equation is used to express the standard error as a proportion of the estimate. The RSE is equal to the SE divided by the estimate and multiplied by 100.


3 RSEs for estimates from 2006-07 MPHS are published for the first time in 'direct' form. Previously a statistical model was produced that relates the size of estimates to their corresponding RSEs, and this information was displayed via an 'SE table'. From this point onwards, RSEs for MPHS estimates have now been calculated for each separate estimate and published individually. The Jackknife method of variance estimation is used for this process, which involves the calculation of 30 'replicate' estimates based on 30 different subsamples of the original sample. The variability of estimates obtained from these subsamples is used to estimate the sample variability surrounding the main estimate.


4 Limited publication space does not allow for the separate indication of the SEs and/or RSEs of all the estimates in this publication, only those for Table 1 have been included at the end of these Technical Notes. However, RSEs for all these estimates are available free-of-charge on the ABS web site <www.abs.gov.au>, released in spreadsheet format as an attachment to this publication, Adult Learning, Australia, 2006-07 (cat. no. 4229.0).


5 In the tables in this publication, only estimates (numbers, percentages, means and medians) with RSEs less than 25% are considered sufficiently reliable for most purposes. However, estimates with larger RSEs have been included and are preceded by an asterisk (e.g. *3.4) to indicate they are subject to high SEs and should be used with caution. Estimates with RSEs greater than 50% are preceded by a double asterisk (e.g. **2.1) to indicate that they are considered too unreliable for general use.



CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR

6 SEs can be calculated using the estimates (counts or means) and the corresponding RSEs. For example Table 1 shows that the estimated number of persons aged 45-49 years who had participated in formal learning in the last 12 months is 167,900. In the corresponding RSE table (on page 45), the RSE for this estimate is shown to be 10.1%. The SE is:


Equation: This equation is used to calculate the SE based on the estimate and corresponding RSE. The SE of the estimate is equal to the RSE divided by 100, multiplied by the estimate.


= 0.101 * 167,900


= 17,000 (rounded to nearest 1,000)


7 Therefore there are about two chances in three that the value that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey will fall within the range 150,900 to 184,900 and about 19 chances in 20 that the value will fall within the range 133,900 to 201,900. This example is illustrated overleaf.

Diagram: This figure is used to illustrate the application of standard error in calculating confidence intervals



PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES

8 Proportions and percentages formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends on the accuracy of both the numerator and the denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below. This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y.


Equation: This equation is used to calculate the RSE of a proportion. The RSE of a proportion is equal to the square root of the RSE of x squared minus the RSE of y squared


9 For example in Table 1 the estimate for the total number of persons aged 25 to 64 years employed full-time is 6,266,500. The estimated number of persons aged 25 to 64 years employed full-time that participated in formal or non-formal learning in the previous 12 months is 2,853,600, so the proportion of persons employed full-time who participated in formal or non-formal learning is 2,853,600/6,266,500 or 45.5%.


10 From the RSE table on page 45 the RSE of the total number of persons aged 25 to 64 years employed full-time is 0.9% and the RSE of the total number of persons aged 25 to 64 years employed full-time that participated in formal or non-formal learning in the previous 12 months is 2.0%.


11 Applying the above formula, the RSE of the proportion is:


Equation: This equation is an example of the equation RSE xy. The RSE of the proportion is equal to the square root of 2.0 squared minus 0.9 squared, this equals 1.8%


12 This then gives an SE of the percentage (45.5%) of (1.8/100) x 45.5 = 0.8 percentage points.


13 Therefore there are about two chances in three that the proportion of persons aged 25 to 64 years employed full-time that participated in formal or non-formal learning is between 44.7% and 46.3% and 19 chances in 20 that the proportion is within the ranges 43.9% and 47.1%.



DIFFERENCES

14 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (of numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula:


Equation: This equation is used to calculate the SE of a proportion. The SE of a proportion is the square root of x squared minus y squared.


15 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication.



SIGNIFICANCE TESTING

16 The statistical significance test for any of the comparisons between estimates was performed to determine whether it is likely that there is a difference between the corresponding population characteristics. The standard error of the difference between two corresponding estimates (x and y) can be calculated using the formula in paragraph 14. This standard error is then used to calculate the following test statistic:


Equation: This equation is used to test if it is likely that there is a difference between corresponding population characteristics. Is calculated by x minus y , divided by the SE of x minus y


17 If the value of this test statistic is greater than 1.96 then we may say there is good evidence of a real difference in the two populations with respect to that characteristic. Otherwise, it cannot be stated with confidence that there is a real difference between the populations.


18 The imprecision due to sampling variability, which is measured by the SE, should not be confused with inaccuracies that may occur because of imperfections in reporting by respondents and recording by interviewers, and errors made in coding and processing data. Inaccuracies of this kind are referred to as non-sampling error, and they occur in any enumeration, whether it be a full count or sample. Every effort is made to reduce non-sampling error to a minimum by careful design of questionnaires, intensive training and supervision of interviewers, and efficient operating procedures.



RELATIVE STANDARD ERROR

19 Relative Standard Errors for Table 1 are included overleaf. However, RSEs for all tables are available free-of-charge on the ABS website <www.abs.gove.au>, released in spreadsheet format as an attachment to this publication, Adult Learning, Australia 2006-07 (cat. no. 4229.0).

ALL PERSONS, Participation in learning by selected characteristics, RSEs

Participated in formal learning
Participated in non-formal learning
Total participated in formal or non-formal learning
Participated in informal learning
Did not participate in learning
All persons aged 25 to 64
%
%
%
%
%
%

Sex
Males
5.1
2.5
2.0
0.6
2.2
0.1
Females
2.8
2.4
1.9
1.2
3.9
-
Age group (years)
25-29
6.8
4.8
3.8
2.1
8.8
0.2
30-34
7.3
3.9
2.9
1.8
6.3
-
35-39
8.0
3.8
3.2
2.6
10.4
-
40-44
8.8
5.4
4.1
2.1
7.4
-
45-49
10.1
4.8
4.2
1.8
6.5
-
50-54
12.2
6.2
5.7
2.2
7.0
-
55-59
14.7
6.8
5.9
2.5
7.3
0.1
60-64
19.5
5.7
5.8
2.5
4.4
0.1
Country of birth
Born in Australia
4.0
2.0
1.7
1.2
3.9
0.7
Born overseas
7.5
3.3
2.8
2.3
4.7
1.7
Area of usual residence
State capital cities
3.6
2.1
1.7
0.9
2.7
-
Rest of Australia
5.1
2.7
2.2
1.4
4.5
0.1
Labour force status
Employed full-time
4.4
2.1
2.0
1.1
2.6
0.9
Employed part-time
7.8
5.0
3.8
2.9
6.3
2.7
Unemployed
17.1
16.4
13.3
8.4
15.3
7.0
Not in the labour force
8.9
8.0
6.6
3.2
5.2
2.5
Level of highest non-school qualification
Postgraduate degree, Graduate diploma or Graduate certificate
9.8
7.3
6.2
4.6
19.5
4.2
Bachelor degree
5.8
3.2
2.9
2.9
10.0
2.7
Advanced diploma or diploma
7.7
5.7
4.8
4.0
14.6
3.2
Certificate III or IV
7.2
5.3
4.1
2.9
6.7
2.4
Certificate I or II
17.0
8.8
7.2
5.7
10.4
5.3
Certificate n.f.d.
20.3
15.5
13.3
10.4
26.0
8.8
No non-school qualification
7.0
5.5
4.0
1.7
2.5
1.2
Highest year of school completed
Year 12 or equivalent
3.7
2.2
1.9
1.5
4.1
1.3
Year 11 or equivalent
9.2
5.5
4.6
2.9
8.4
3.0
Year 10 or equivalent
6.3
4.2
3.8
2.8
4.1
2.3
Year 9 or equivalent
17.1
10.0
9.0
6.7
7.0
4.2
Year 8 or below
35.8
17.6
14.5
7.3
8.3
4.7
Equivalised weekly household income - quintiles
Lowest quintile
11.7
8.4
7.4
4.3
5.3
2.5
Second quintile
8.9
7.2
5.9
4.1
5.9
3.0
Third quintile
8.1
5.5
5.0
3.5
6.3
3.1
Fourth quintile
5.6
3.3
3.2
3.1
5.4
2.2
Highest quintile
6.4
3.7
3.5
2.5
8.6
2.6
Not known or not stated
11.5
5.2
5.5
3.6
6.4
3.2
Total(a)(b)
2.8
1.8
1.4
0.8
2.4
-

- nil or rounded to zero (including null cells)
(a) Includes persons whose country of birth could not be determined.
(b) Includes persons whose level of highest non-school qualification could not be determined and persons who have never attended school.