- Special Data Dissemination Standard: Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board.
- https://www.apsc.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-12/aps_data_professional_strategy_0.pdf.
- Results of 2025–26 are set as the benchmark.
Performance information
The Commonwealth Performance Framework, established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013, encompasses a cycle of performance planning, monitoring and reporting. The Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) and Corporate Plan are our key forward planning publications and outline how we will measure and assess our performance. The Annual Report is our primary reporting publication and provides the assessment of our performance and achievements.
The ABS Enterprise Performance Framework outlines our approach to meeting our legislative requirements, the Commonwealth Performance Framework and other guidance material.
We regularly review our performance measures to ensure they reflect our purpose and remain relevant and appropriate. The changes made to performance information for this Corporate Plan are detailed in the changes to performance measures page.
Key activity 1: Produce high-quality statistics and insights
Performance measure 1.1:
Trust in ABS statistics – level of trust in the ABS and its statistics
ABS data informs important decisions made by government, business, and the community. It underpins sound fiscal and monetary policy decisions and informs the delivery of programs and services vital to the health and wellbeing of the people of Australia. ABS data also supports a functioning democracy, contributing to fair electoral boundaries and informed community debate.
It is imperative that the ABS maintains a high level of trust in both the institution and the statistics that are produced to ensure survey response rates are maintained and ensure ABS statistics continue to be the preferred source of data for Australia’s important decisions.
| Method #1 | Target | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Community Trust in ABS Statistics Survey (CTASS) | At least 85% level of trust in the ABS At least 85% level of trust in ABS statistics | Not measured in this Corporate Plan period |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Output |
| Methodology | The CTASS assesses trust among members of the general community and informed users and is conducted every five years by an independent third-party provider. The CTASS was last conducted in 2025, with results showing 90% of the general community and 100% of informed users trust the ABS as an organisation. Further 89% of the general community and 100% of informed users trust ABS statistics. These results were reported in the 2024–25 Annual Report. The next survey will be conducted in 2030 with results reported in the 2030–31 Annual Report. |
| Target rationale | The CTASS is conducted every 5 years, prior to the Census of Population and Housing to gauge public sentiment as distinct to awareness of the Census. This frequency will be maintained. The next survey collection will be undertaken in 2030. As a result, this method will not be assessed in the 2026–27 Corporate Plan period. |
| Method #2 | Target | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Number of statistics released on the ABS website are free of significant errors | 100% of statistics released on the ABS website are free of significant errors | 2026–27 to 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Output |
| Methodology | The measure is expressed as a proportion of statistical releases published on the ABS website that are deemed to be of national or state importance. A significant error is one that is either identified by our staff or by users that could mislead important or large groups of users regarding the value of a statistical indicator of national or state importance, resulting in a high impact on the quality of decisions made using the data. |
| Target rationale | We have a low appetite for risks that could compromise the quality and integrity of our statistical outputs, recognising that public trust and confidence are central to our purpose. Stringent controls and validation processes are in place to ensure all published statistics are of the highest standard and free from significant errors. |
Performance measure 1.2:
International compliance – ABS statistics meet the standards for National and International Accounts, Labour Force, Unemployment, Consumer Price Index and Estimated Resident Population
The assurance that the ABS consistently meets international standards set by an independent body, in this instance the International Monetary Fund (IMF), results in a high degree of trust in the quality and impartiality of ABS statistics, along with the ability to confidently compare Australia’s results to international comparators.
Meeting the standards also reflects the timeliness with which the ABS produces specific statistics. The use of ABS statistics to inform important government, business, and household decisions is demonstrated through the regular use by government of these statistics.
| Method | Target | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) [1] | The IMF assesses the ABS to be 100% compliant with the SDDS for in-scope collections | 2026–27 to 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Output |
| Methodology | The annual SDDS assessment is made on a calendar year basis and is typically available on the IMF website in the first or second quarter of the following calendar year. During this process, the IMF assesses us on our compliance with the SDDS for in-scope collections. |
| Target rationale | The target is aligned with our overarching performance measure published in the 2026–27 Portfolio Budget Statements: High-quality statistics and insights are produced to inform decision making by governments, business and the community. |
| Alignment | Portfolio Budget Statement (PBS) 2026–27 performance measure – Program 1.1 |
Performance measure 1.3:
Conduct the Census – implementation of the Census to deliver trusted data
Information from the Census of Population and Housing (the Census) helps governments, businesses and not for profit organisations across the country make informed decisions. The Census improves the accuracy of population estimates for Australia in each state, territory, and local government area. It informs decisions on electoral boundaries and underpins funding to states, territories and local governments. It informs decisions for services and infrastructure such as roads, childcare, hospitals and schools for every community in Australia. The Census is also a vital tool for a myriad of investment decisions made by businesses across all sectors of the economy and is used by community groups to inform support for some of the most vulnerable people in Australia.
| Methods | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
|
| 2026–27 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Completion of the release of data on all prescribed 2026 Census topics | Data is publicly released on all prescribed 2026 Census topics | 2027–28 |
| Complete public consultation on 2031 Census topics | Publish the proposed 2031 Census topics on the ABS website | 2028–29 |
| Finalise the proposed 2031 Census topics | Regulations are updated to define the 2031 Census topics | 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Qualitative / Quantitative / Output |
| Methodology | The Census is the biggest and most comprehensive data collection by the ABS, collecting detailed information on every person and household in Australia. The successful completion of the major phases of the Census demonstrates our capability to conduct a large-scale data collection, ensuring high-quality and reliable statistics that inform critical decisions for Australia’s future. |
| Target rationale | The Census is a five-year project. Each year, there are different major milestones. For this reason, each year of the Census cycle will have different targets, to represent the key milestones for that phase of the Census cycle. |
| Changes from previous year | In the 2025–26 Corporate Plan, the 2028–29 method and target focused on finalising the proposed 2031 Census topics and publishing proposed 2031 Census topics on the ABS website. The method and target have been changed to completing the public consultation on 2031 Census topics and publishing the proposed 2031 Census topics on the ABS website to reflect current planning. |
Performance measure 1.4:
Access to ABS data and statistics – access to data products and services
Measurement of access to ABS data and statistics indicates demand for ABS data. There are five key channels for media, academics, government, and the public to access ABS data. The increasing use of these data sources indicate continued trust in ABS data by stakeholders and the public.
Measurement of the use of these channels allows the ABS to assess how different groups interact with ABS data. Different users come to the ABS for a variety of reasons; the information they seek to address their needs can be as simple as a single number, or as complex as statistical analysis.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
Composite index of channel access:
| 1% increase on previous year result | 2026–27 |
| 1% increase on previous year result | 2027–28 | |
| 1% decrease on previous year result | 2028–29 | |
| Maintain previous year result | 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Output |
| Methodology | An index that combines channel access, with each channel having the same weight. Access (as measured by a raw count) for each channel is converted into a composite index that can be compared to the benchmark (previous) year. The change (increase or decrease) in the composite index value for the combined channels will be reported as the actual result against the target. The results are interpreted as the percentage change against the benchmark year. For each of the 5 channels, the count for the current year is divided by the count in the previous (benchmark) year. The composite index is calculated by taking the average of the 5 channels and multiplying by 100. Individual channel results may fluctuate. |
| Target rationale | From 2025–26 the annual target has been set based on the previous year’s actual result. Increases or decreases of the target are made with consideration of expected changes in our operating environment, such as the release of 2026 Census data, leading to shifts in the demand and access to our data. |
Key activity 2: Exercise leadership in strengthening Australia’s data capabilities
Performance measure 2.1:
Adoption of secure data infrastructure – providing secure data management and data sharing capabilities to support the Australian Government and state and territory governments
The Secure Environment for Analysing Data (SEAD) was designed to meet demand for secure cloud-based data access services across the Australian Government, facilitating policy and research outcomes. Measuring the adoption of SEAD services provides insight into how the ABS supports capability uplift across other official bodies by enabling them to make better use of their data.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Total Secure Environment for Analysing Data (SEAD) agreements to date | Total of 16 agreements to date | 2026–27 |
| Total of 18 agreements to date | 2027–28 | |
| Total of 20 agreements to date | 2028–29 | |
| Total of 22 agreements to date | 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Output |
| Methodology | SEAD provides government agencies (both federal and state level) with a secure, self-contained environment called a ‘SEADpod’, operating independently within our DataLab cloud infrastructure. Agencies can adopt a SEADpod and manage their data, users, projects and outputs via self-service features, maintaining control in accordance with their own legislative, policy and risk requirements. We maintain and develop the underlying system. A SEAD agreement either external to the ABS (Memorandum of Understanding) or internal within the ABS (Service Level Agreement)) covers the provisioning of one SEADpod, unless otherwise specified. Terms are clearly outlined within the agreements. |
| Target rationale | The adoption of SEADpods is expected to maintain a steady growth of 2 agreements per year. |
Performance measure 2.2:
Engagement with the APS Data Profession – enhancing our engagement with Australian Public Servants who use data for informed decision-making
The ABS leads the APS Data Profession, with the Australian Statistician serving as Head of Profession. The Data Profession strengthens data capability of the APS data workforce through defining data capabilities, creating career pathways and development opportunities. It also focuses on enabling the APS to attract, develop and retain the data capabilities needed to capitalise on the rapid growth in the availability and use of data.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| 5% increase on previous year result | 2026–27 to 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Effectiveness |
| Methodology | Members of the Data Profession have exclusive access to the ABS’ Members Community Platform (MCP). The MCP allows data professionals to connect, collaborate, ask questions, engage in discussions, find events and share learning resources to increase data capabilities. This delivers on the APS Data Professional Strategy[2] by establishing a community for knowledge sharing, best practices and targeted training. The number of members of and interactions with the MCP demonstrates the engagement and positive cultural shift required to shape the capabilities and effectiveness of the APS. |
| Target rationale | The uptake and engagement with the MCP over the Corporate Plan period are expected to maintain a steady growth of 5% each year. Results are benchmarked to the previous financial year. |
Key activity 3: Strengthen relationships and reduce load on data providers
Performance measure 3.1:
Efficiency of statistical operations – improving data collection and processing methods
The ABS pursues innovative solutions to make the collection of statistical information more efficient for the agency, as well as less burdensome for data providers. Multiple initiatives are currently being pursued. One of these, the Whole of Australian Government Coding service, will deliver efficiencies through automated and standardised coding, reducing the inputs required to produce its diverse suite of high-quality statistical products.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Use of Whole of Australian Government Coding Service to improve efficiency of statistical operations | $4 million saving compared to the 2021 Census coding of occupation, industry, education, and other in scope topics. | 2026–27 |
| The 2025–26 Corporate Plan advised that a target would be outlined in 2026–27. This target has not been set, as the onboarding strategy for the Whole of Australian Government Coding Service is still under development. A target will be included in the 2027–28 Corporate Plan. | 2027–28 | |
| The target has been removed as described above. A target will be included in the 2027–28 Corporate Plan. | 2028–29 | |
| The target will be included in the 2027–28 Corporate Plan. | 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Efficiency |
| Methodology | The Whole of Australian Government Coding Service is being used across a range of our statistical collections to improve the efficiency of statistical operations for, and coherence between, Australia’s occupation data assets. The service will reduce time and effort spent on data processing and enhance the quality and usability of data collections. |
| Target rationale | The Whole of Australian Government Coding Service will be implemented across a range of ABS statistical collections, beginning with Causes of Death and the 2026 Census. The target in 2026–27 for Census has been set to align with the expected realisation of benefits associated with using the Coding service. |
| Changes from previous year | The 2025–26 Corporate Plan advised that a target for 2027–28 would be set in this plan. This has not occurred, as described above. The 2025–26 Corporate Plan also included a forward target for 2028–29: “All occupation, industry, religious affiliation, language spoken at home, ancestry, education and country of birth statistics collected by the ABS are coded using the Whole of Australian Government Coding Service.” This target has been removed while the onboarding approach is being finalised. Targets will be included in the 2027–28 Corporate Plan. |
Performance measure 3.2:
Data collection effort and respondent experience – improve data collection methods and the experience for business and households
The principal objective of the ABS for providers is to impose the lowest possible burden while continuing to provide government and the community with high-quality statistics. We frequently review data collection methods to ensure we collect information efficiently and are increasing the use of administrative data, including data collected by government and businesses, to reduce the need to conduct surveys.
This performance measure demonstrates the ABS’ priority to reduce provider burden and deliver on the commitment made to the Government to reduce total hours of respondent burden.
| Method #1 | Targets[3] | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Total time taken for survey respondents to complete business surveys | 5% decrease on benchmark | 2026–27 |
| 10% decrease on benchmark | 2027–28 | |
| 12% decrease on benchmark | 2028–29 | |
| 14% decrease on benchmark | 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Efficiency |
| Methodology | This method allows us to evaluate burden placed on businesses to acquire the data needed to fulfil statistical production requirements. ‘Total time taken’ provides a general measure of the burden experienced by respondents, is consistent with other National Statistical Offices’ measurement of provider burden and can be tracked over time. |
| Target rationale | A new baseline has been set in 2025–26. The new methodology for ensuring consistency in reporting time taken will make the performance figures incomparable to the previous benchmark set in the 2020–21 Corporate Plan. Targets for 2026–27 and 2027–28 have been set in line with the expected performance levels. A smaller incremental target for 2028–29 and 2029–30 has been set based on the likely level of investment we will be able to make to reduce provider burden, given broader priorities and commitments. |
| Method #2 | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of households responding online | 50% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2026–27 |
| 55% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2027–28 | |
| 65% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2028–29 | |
| 65% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2029–30 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / Efficiency |
| Methodology | Measures the proportion of households completing the Monthly Population Survey (MPS) online, as opposed to other methods. Uptake of the online forms for the MPS provides an indication of the success of our initiatives to modernise data acquisition processes and improve respondent experience through a digital first approach to collect data from Australians. |
| Target rationale | Targets are aligned to commitments made in the Data Acquisition Modernisation investment process, to support uptake of online completion of the MPS. They reflect the figures as per the program benefits baseline measures and final benefits realisation outcomes. It is expected that the proportion of households responding online will rise from 2026–27 to 2028–29 following the uplift to online data collection platforms for the MPS in June 2026. Given no further changes to the Data Acquisition Modernisation Program in 2029–30, the target is unchanged from the previous year. |