- https://dsbb.imf.org/sdds/country/AUS/category
- The target for 2024–25 was 10 agreements.
- https://www.apsc.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-12/aps_data_professional_strategy_0.pdf
- The target for 2024–25 was 41% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online.
Performance information
The Commonwealth Performance Framework, established under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013, encompasses a cycle of performance planning, monitoring and reporting. The Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) and Corporate Plan are our key forward planning publications and outline how we will measure and assess our performance. The Annual Report is our main reporting publication and provides the assessment of our performance and achievements.
The ABS Enterprise Performance Framework outlines our approach to meeting our legislative requirements, the Commonwealth Performance Framework and other guidance material.
We regularly review our performance measures to ensure they reflect our purpose and remain relevant and appropriate. The changes made to performance information for this Corporate Plan are detailed in the changes to performance measures page.
Key activity 1: Produce high-quality statistics and insights
Performance measure 1.1:
Trust in ABS statistics - level of trust in the ABS and its statistics
Our data informs important decisions made by government, business and the community. It underpins sound fiscal and monetary policy decisions and informs the delivery of programs and services vital to the health and wellbeing of the people of Australia. Our data also supports a functioning democracy, contributing to fair electoral boundaries and informed community debate.
It is crucial that we uphold an exceptional level of trust in both our institution and the statistics and insights we offer. This trust is essential for maintaining high response rates, ensuring our statistics are of high quality and reflective of the Australian society and economy and we remain the main source of data for Australia’s important decisions.
| Method #1 | Target | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Community Trust in ABS Statistics Survey (CTASS) | At least 85% level of trust in the ABS and ABS statistics | Not measured in this Corporate Plan period |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / output |
| Methodology | The CTASS assesses trust among members of the general community and informed users and is conducted every five years by an independent third-party provider. The CTASS was last conducted in 2025, with results reported in the Annual Performance Statement 2024–25. It will next be conducted in 2030 with results reported in the Annual Performance Statement 2029–30. |
| Target rationale | The CTASS is conducted every 5 years, before the Census of Population and Housing to gauge public sentiment as distinct to awareness of the Census. This frequency will be maintained. The next survey collection will be undertaken in 2030. As a result, this method will not be assessed in the Corporate Plan 2025–26 period. |
| Method #2 | Target | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Number of statistics released on the ABS website are free of significant errors | 100% of statistics are released on the ABS website are free of significant errors | 2025–26 to 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / output |
| Methodology | The number of statistics released on our website free of significant errors, expressed as a proportion of all statistical releases published on our website. Significant errors are errors in statistical releases published on our website, either identified by our staff or by users, that could mislead important or large groups of users regarding the value of a statistical indicator of national or state importance, resulting in a high impact on the quality of decisions based on that data. |
| Target rationale | We have a low tolerance for risks that may lead to significant statistical errors that have the potential to erode the integrity and reliability of our statistical data and institutional trust. Stringent controls and validation processes are in place to ensure all published statistics are of the highest standard and free from significant errors. |
Performance measure 1.2:
International compliance - ABS statistics meet the standards for National and International Accounts, Labour Force, Unemployment, Consumer Price Index and Estimated Resident Population
Compliance with international standards set by an independent body (in this instance the International Monetary Fund) supports a high degree of trust in the quality and impartiality of our statistics, along with the ability to confidently compare Australia’s results to international comparators.
Meeting the standards also reflects the timeliness with which we publish specific statistics. The use of our statistics to inform important government, business and household decisions is demonstrated through the regular use by government of these statistics.
| Method | Target | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) [1] | IMF assess the ABS to be 100% compliant with the SDDS for in-scope collections | 2025–26 to 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / output |
| Methodology | The annual SDDS assessment is made on a calendar year basis and typically available on the IMF website in the first or second quarter of the following calendar year. During this process, the IMF assesses us on our compliance with the SDDS for in-scope collections. |
| Target rationale | The target is aligned with our overarching performance criterion published in the PBS 2025–26. |
Alignment
Performance measure 1.3:
Conduct the Census - implementation of the Census to deliver trusted data
Information from the Census helps governments, businesses and not-for-profit organisations across the country make informed decisions. The Census provides accurate population estimates for Australia in each state, territory and local government area. It informs decisions on electoral boundaries and underpins funding to states, territories and local governments. It informs decisions for services and infrastructure such as roads, childcare, hospitals and schools for every community in Australia. The Census is also a vital tool for a myriad of investment decisions made by businesses across all sectors of the economy and is used by community groups to inform support for some of the most vulnerable people in Australia.
| Methods | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Successful completion of the 2025 Census Operational Readiness Exercise (ORE) | Census ORE is completed and the evaluation report is agreed and accepted by the 2026 Census Executive Board | 2025–26 |
|
| 2026–27 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Completion of the release of data on all 2026 Census topics | Data is publicly released on all prescribed 2026 Census topics | 2027–28 |
| Finalise the proposed 2031 Census topics | Publish the proposed 2031 Census topics on the ABS website | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Qualitative / quantitative / output |
| Methodology | The Census is the biggest and most comprehensive survey we undertake, collecting detailed information on every person and household in Australia. The successful completion of the major phases of the Census demonstrates our capability to conduct a large-scale data collection, ensuring high-quality and reliable statistics that inform critical decisions for Australia’s future. |
| Target rationale | The Census is a five-year project. Each year, there are different major milestones. For this reason, each year of the Census cycle will have different targets, to represent the key milestones for that phase of the Census cycle. |
Performance measure 1.4:
Access to ABS data and statistics - access to data products and services
Measurement of access to our data and statistics indicates the level of interest, demand and usage. There are five key channels for media, academics, government and the public to access our data. The increasing use of these data sources combined indicates a growth in trust in our data by stakeholders and the public.
Measurement of the use of these channels allows us to assess how different groups interact with our data. Different users come to us for a variety of reasons; the information they seek to address their needs can be as simple as a single number, or as complex as statistical analysis.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
Composite index of channel access:
| 1% increase on benchmark | 2025–26 |
| 1% increase on benchmark | 2026–27 | |
| 1% increase on benchmark | 2027–28 | |
| 1% decrease on benchmark | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / output |
| Methodology | An index that combines channel access, with each channel having the same weight. Access (as measured by a raw count) for each channel is converted into a composite index that can be compared to the benchmark (previous) year. The change (increase or decrease) in the composite index value for the combined channels will be reported as the actual result against the target. The results are interpreted as the percentage change against the benchmark year. For each of the 5 channels, the count for the current year is divided by the count in the previous (benchmark) year. The composite index is calculated by taking the average of the 5 channels and multiplying by 100. Individual channel results may fluctuate. |
| Target rationale | The benchmark is set to the value of 100 in 2024–25 and from 2025–26 is benchmarked to the previous year’s actual results. Increases or decreases of the target are made with consideration of expected changes in our operating environment, such as the release of 2026 Census data, leading to shifts in the demand and access to our data. |
Key activity 2: Exercise leadership in strengthening Australia’s data capabilities
Performance measure 2.1:
Adoption of secure data infrastructure - providing secure data management and data sharing capabilities to support the Australian Government and state and territory governments
We lead the use of public data for statistical purposes and work to improve the Australian Government’s data and statistical capabilities. We achieve this, in part, by providing secure data management and data sharing capabilities to support the Australian Government and state and territory governments to make better use of their data.
The Secure Environment for Analysing Data (SEAD) was designed to meet demand for secure cloud-based data access services across the Australian Government, facilitating policy and research outcomes. Measuring the adoption of SEAD services gives insight into how we support the capability uplift across other official bodies by enabling them to make better use of their data.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Number of agreements for Secure Environment for Analysing Data (SEAD) services | 14 agreements[2] | 2025–26 |
| 16 agreements | 2026–27 | |
| 18 agreements | 2027–28 | |
| 20 agreements | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / output |
| Methodology | SEAD gives government agencies (both federal and state level) a secure, self-contained environment called a ‘SEADpod’, operating independently within our DataLab cloud infrastructure. Agencies can adopt a SEADpod and manage their data, users, projects and outputs via self-service features, maintaining control in accordance with their own legislative, policy and risk requirements. We maintain and develop the underlying system. A SEAD agreement (either external to the ABS (Memorandum of Understanding) or internal within the ABS (Service Level Agreement)) covers the provisioning of one SEADpod, unless otherwise specified. Terms are clearly outlined within the agreements. |
| Target rationale | The adoption of SEADpods is expected to maintain a steady growth of 2 agreements per year. |
Performance measure 2.2:
Engagement with the APS Data Profession - enhancing our engagement with Australian Public Servants who use data for informed decision-making
We are leading the APS Data Profession, with the Australian Statistician as the Head of Profession. The Data Profession aims to uplift the data capability of the APS workforce through defining data capabilities, creating career pathways and providing access to development opportunities. The Profession aims to ensure the APS workforce can attract, develop and retain the data capabilities needed to harness the unprecedented growth in the availability and use of data.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| 5% increase on benchmark | 2025–26 |
| 5% increase on benchmark | 2026–27 | |
| 5% increase on benchmark | 2027–28 | |
| 5% increase on benchmark | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / effectiveness |
| Methodology | Members of the APS Data Profession have exclusive access to the MCP. The MCP allows data professionals to connect, collaborate, ask questions, engage in discussions, find events and share learning resources to grow data capabilities. This delivers on the APS Data Professional Strategy[3] by establishing a community for knowledge sharing, best practices and targeted training. The number of members of and interactions with the MCP demonstrates the engagement and positive cultural shift needed to shape the capabilities and effectiveness of the APS. |
| Target rationale | The uptake and engagement with the MCP over the Corporate Plan period are expected to maintain a steady growth of 5% each year. Results are benchmarked to the previous financial year. The benchmark value is set to 100. |
Key activity 3: Strengthen relationships and reduce load on data providers
Performance measure 3.1:
Efficiency of statistical operations - improving data collection and processing methods
We are actively pursuing innovative solutions to make the collection of statistical information more efficient for the agency, as well as less burdensome for data providers. Although multiple initiatives are currently being pursued, the Whole of Australian Government Coding Service will deliver efficiencies through automated and standardised coding, reducing the inputs needed to produce its increasingly diverse suite of high-quality statistical products.
| Method | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Use of Whole of Australian Government Coding Service to improve the efficiency of statistical operations | 10% reduction in human effort (hours and minutes) to code occupation data in the Causes of Death statistical collection compared to using the legacy index coder | 2025–26 |
| $4 million saving compared to the 2021 Census coding of occupation, industry, education and other in scope topics | 2026–27 | |
| Target not available – will be outlined in the ABS Corporate Plan 2026–27 | 2027–28 | |
| All occupation, industry, religious affiliation, language spoken at home, ancestry, education and country of birth statistics collected by the ABS are coded using the Whole of Australian Government Coding Service | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / efficiency |
| Methodology | The Whole of Australian Government Coding Service is being used across a range of our statistical collections to improve the efficiency of statistical operations for and coherence between, Australia’s occupation data assets. The Service will reduce time and effort spent on data processing and enhance the quality and usability of data collections. |
| Target rationale | The Whole of Australian Government Coding Service will be implemented across a range of ABS statistical collections, beginning with the Causes of Death and the 2026 Census. Targets for 2025–26 and 2026–27 have been set to align with the expected realisation of benefits associated with using the Coding Service. The target for 2027–28 will be developed after the completion of the Strategy for Topic Coding Service 2025–26 to 2029–30. This will be published in the The target for 2028–29 is aligned to the Strategy for Topic Coding Service 2025–26 to 2029–30, which was finalised in June 2025. |
Performance measure 3.2:
Data collection effort and respondent experience – improve data collection methods and the experience for business and households
A principal objective with data providers is to impose the lowest level of burden possible whilst meeting our obligations to offer government and the community high-quality official statistics. We frequently review data collection methods to ensure we collect information efficiently and are increasing the use of admin data, including data collected by government and businesses, to reduce the need to conduct surveys.
This performance measure demonstrates our priority to reduce provider burden and deliver on the commitment made to the Australian Government in 2020–21 to reduce total hours of respondent burden.
| Method #1 | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Total time taken for survey respondents to complete business surveys | No target – benchmark year | 2025–26 |
| 5% decrease on benchmark | 2026–27 | |
| 10% decrease on benchmark | 2027–28 | |
| 12% decrease on benchmark | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / efficiency |
| Methodology | This method allows us to evaluate burden placed on businesses to acquire the data needed to fulfil statistical production requirements. ‘Total time taken’ gives a general sense of the burden experienced by respondents, is consistent with other National Statistical Offices’ measurement of provider burden and can be tracked over time. |
| Target rationale | A new baseline has been implemented in 2025–26. The new methodology for ensuring consistency in reporting time taken will make the performance figures incomparable to the previous benchmark set in the ABS Corporate Plan 2020–21. Targets for 2026–27 and 2027–28 have been set in line with the existing level of ambition from the previous targets. A smaller incremental target for 2028–29 has been set based on the likely level of investment we will be able to make to reduce provider burden, given broader priorities and commitments. |
| Method #2 | Targets | Years measured |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of households responding online | 42% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online[4] | 2025–26 |
| 50% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2026–27 | |
| 55% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2027–28 | |
| 65% of households complete the Monthly Population Survey online | 2028–29 |
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Type | Quantitative / efficiency |
| Methodology | Measures the proportion of households completing the Monthly Population Survey (MPS) online, as opposed to other methods. Uptake of the online forms for the MPS gives an indication of the success of our initiatives to modernise data acquisition process and improve respondent experience through a digital first approach to collect data from Australians. |
| Target rationale | Targets are aligned to commitments made in the Data Acquisition Modernisation investment process, to support uptake of online completion of the MPS. They reflect the figures as per the program benefits baseline measures and final benefits realisation outcomes. It is expected that the number of households responding online will accelerate from 2026–27 after the uplift to online data collection platforms for the MPS in June 2026. |