6265.0 - Underemployed Workers, Australia, Sep 2006  
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 26/02/2007   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

TECHNICAL NOTE DATA QUALITY


INTRODUCTION

1 Since the estimates in this publication are based on information obtained from occupants of a sample of dwellings, they are subject to sampling variability. That is, they may differ from those estimates that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey. One measure of the likely difference is given by the standard error (SE), which indicates the extent to which an estimate might have varied by chance because only a sample of dwellings was included. There are about two chances in three (67%) that a sample estimate will differ by less than one SE from the number that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included, and about 19 chances in 20 (95%) that the difference will be less than two SEs. Another measure of the likely difference is the relative standard error (RSE), which is obtained by expressing the SE as a percentage of the estimate.


2 Due to space limitations, it is impractical to print the SE of each estimate in the publication. Instead, a table of SEs is provided to enable readers to determine the SE for an estimate from the size of that estimate (see table T1). The SE table is derived from a mathematical model, referred to as the 'SE model', which is created using data from a number of past Labour Force Surveys. It should be noted that the SE model only gives an approximate value for the SE for any particular estimate, since there is some minor variation between SEs for different estimates of the same size.



CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR

3 An example of the calculation and the use of SEs in relation to estimates of persons is as follows. Table 5 shows the estimated number of female underemployed part-time workers was 297,400. Since this estimate is between 200,000 and 300,000, table T1 shows that the SE for Australia will lie between 5,300 and 6,350 and can be approximated by interpolation using the following general formula:


Equation: Example of standard error calculation


4 Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the value that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey will fall within the range 291,100 to 303,700 and about 19 chances in 20 that the value will fall within the range 284,800 to 310,000. This example is illustrated in the following diagram.

Diagram: The range in which the true value may fall


5 In general, the size of the SE increases as the size of the estimate increases. Conversely, the RSE decreases as the size of the estimate increases. Very small estimates are thus subject to such high RSEs that their value for most practical purposes is unreliable. In the tables in this publication, only estimates with RSEs of 25% or less are considered reliable for most purposes. Estimates with RSEs greater than 25% but less than or equal to 50% are preceded by an asterisk (e.g.*3.2) to indicate they are subject to high SEs and should be used with caution. Estimates with RSEs of greater than 50%, preceded by a double asterisk (e.g.**0.3), are considered too unreliable for general use and should only be used to aggregate with other estimates to provide derived estimates with RSEs of less than 25%.



MEANS AND MEDIANS

6 The RSEs of estimates of mean duration of insufficient work, median duration of insufficient work and mean preferred number of extra hours are obtained by first finding the RSE of the estimate of the total number of persons contributing to the mean or median (see table T1) and then multiplying the resulting number by the following factors:

  • mean duration of insufficient work: 1.6
  • median duration of insufficient work: 2.5
  • mean preferred number of extra hours: 0.7

7 The following is an example of the calculation of SEs where the use of a factor is required. Table 5 shows that the estimated number of male underemployed part-time workers was 186,500 with a median duration of insufficient work of 24 weeks. The SE of 186,500 can be calculated from table T1 (by interpolation) as 5,100. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate or 5,100/186,500 =2.7%.


8 The RSE of the estimate of median duration of insufficient work is calculated by multiplying this number (2.7%) by the appropriate factor shown in paragraph 6 (in this case 2.5): 2.7 x 2.5 = 6.8%. The SE of this estimate of median duration of insufficient work is therefore 6.8% of 24, i.e. about 2 (rounded to the nearest whole week). Therefore, there are two chances in three that the median duration of insufficient work for males that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included in the survey would have been within the range 22-26 weeks, and about 19 chances in 20 that it would have been within the range 20-28 weeks.



PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES

9 Proportions and percentages formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends on the accuracy of both the numerator and the denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below. This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y.


Equation: Calculation of the RSE of a proportion


10 Considering the example from paragraph 3, of the 297,400 female underemployed part-time workers, 102,800 or 34.6% had insufficient work for 52 weeks and over. The SE of 102,800 may be calculated by interpolation as 4,000. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate, or 4,000/102,800 = 3.9%. The SE for 297,400 was calculated previously as 6,300, which converted to an RSE is 6,300/297,400 = 2.1%. Applying the above formula, the RSE of the proportion is:


Equation: Example of calculating the RSE of a proportion


11 Therefore, the SE for the proportion of females who have a current period of insufficient work of 52 weeks or more is 1.1 percentage points (=(34.6/100)x3.3). Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the proportion of females who have a current period of insufficient work of 52 weeks or more was between 33.5% and 35.7% and 19 chances in 20 that the proportion is within the range 32.4% to 36.8%.



DIFFERENCES

12 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (of numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula:


Equation: Standard error of the difference between two estimates


13 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication.



STANDARD ERRORS

T1 STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATES

Aust.
NSW
Vic.
Qld.
SA
WA
Tas.
NT
ACT
SE
RSE
Size of estimate (persons)
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
%

100
290
250
250
150
160
100
90
140
100
100.0
200
380
330
330
210
220
140
140
180
180
90.0
300
440
390
390
250
260
180
170
200
240
80.0
500
540
470
470
300
330
220
230
230
350
70.0
700
620
540
540
350
380
260
270
260
430
61.4
1000
710
620
610
400
440
300
320
280
540
54.0
1500
830
730
710
470
520
340
380
320
690
46.0
2000
920
810
790
530
590
370
420
340
820
41.0
2500
1 000
900
850
550
650
400
450
350
900
36.0
3000
1 100
950
900
600
700
400
500
400
1 000
33.3
3500
1 150
1 000
950
650
750
450
500
400
1 100
31.4
4000
1 200
1 050
1 000
700
750
450
500
400
1 200
30.0
5000
1 300
1 150
1 100
750
850
500
550
450
1 300
26.0
7000
1 500
1 300
1 250
850
950
550
700
500
1 550
22.1
10000
1 700
1 500
1 400
950
1 100
650
850
600
1 800
18.0
15000
2 000
1 750
1 600
1 100
1 250
800
1 150
750
2 100
14.0
20000
2 200
1 950
1 800
1 200
1 400
950
1 450
850
2 300
11.5
30000
2 600
2 300
2 050
1 450
1 600
1 250
1 950
1 100
2 650
8.8
40000
2 850
2 550
2 250
1 700
1 750
1 500
2 500
1 350
2 900
7.3
50000
3 100
2 800
2 450
1 900
1 950
1 750
2 950
1 500
3 100
6.2
100000
4 050
3 600
3 400
2 900
3 050
2 600
5 300
2 050
4 000
4.0
150000
4 800
4 350
4 250
3 700
4 100
3 200
7 500
2 350
4 700
3.1
200000
5 550
5 200
5 100
4 400
4 950
3 650
9 700
2 450
5 300
2.7
300000
7 100
6 800
6 800
5 450
6 250
4 300
14 050
2 550
6 350
2.1
500000
9 950
9 300
9 550
6 900
7 950
5 150
. .
2 550
8 100
1.6
1000000
14 950
13 700
13 500
9 000
10 050
6 250
. .
. .
11 600
1.2
2000000
21 350
19 350
16 550
11 000
11 400
. .
. .
. .
17 150
0.9
5000000
31 500
28 550
17 350
13 000
11 500
. .
. .
. .
29 250
0.6
10000000
39 750
36 450
15 250
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
39 200
0.4
15000000
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
44 050
0.3

. . not applicable

T2 LEVELS AT WHICH ESTIMATES HAVE RELATIVE STANDARD ERRORS OF 25% AND 50%(a)

NSW
Vic.
Qld.
SA
WA
Tas.
NT
ACT
Aust.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.

RSE OF 25%

Mean duration of current period of insufficient work
11 700
10 400
9 200
4 300
6 000
2 400
3 000
2 000
12 900
Median duration of current period of insufficient work
28 800
24 600
23 600
13 200
14 200
5 700
14 200
6 800
24 900
Mean preferred number of extra hours
3 300
3 200
2 500
1 500
1 800
900
1 100
700
3 000
All other estimates
5 400
4 400
4 100
2 200
2 600
1 300
1 500
1 200
5 500

RSE OF 50%

Mean duration of current period of insufficient work
3 800
3 400
3 100
1 400
2 000
800
1 000
800
3 700
Median duration of current period of insufficient work
9 500
8 000
8 300
4 600
4 800
2 300
6 200
2 700
8 200
Mean preferred number of extra hours
1 100
1 000
800
500
600
300
300
300
500
All other estimates
1 800
1 400
1 400
700
800
400
400
400
1 200

(a) Refers to the number of people contributing to the estimate.