8146.0.55.001 - Patterns of internet access in Australia, 2006  
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 29/11/2007  First Issue
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All  
Contents >> Socio-Economic Aspects >> Chapter 5 Socio-economic factors in Internet and Broadband access - by Dwelling and Household

CHAPTER 5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS IN INTERNET AND BROADBAND ACCESS - BY DWELLING AND HOUSEHOLD

In this chapter, socio-economic characteristics of households with Internet access is examined. Variables relating to households examined are:


Income

  • Weekly equivalised household income

Dwelling characteristics
  • Type of tenure

Household Characteristics
  • Family composition
  • Family blending
  • Household composition


5.1. Income

In this study, weekly equivalised household income is used as a measure of income for examining the association of income on dwelling Internet access rates. Equivalised household income is the total household income adjusted by the application of an equivalence scale to facilitate comparison of income levels between households of differing size and composition. Equivalised household income can be viewed as an indicator of the economic resources available to a standard household. For a lone person household, it is equal to household income. For a household consisting of more than one person, it is an indicator of the household income that would be needed by a lone person household to enjoy the same level of economic wellbeing (see Census Dictionary for further detail).


Proportions of dwellings with Internet and Broadband access are higher for higher income groupings.


The $2,000 or more income group recorded the highest rate of Broadband connection (67%), and the rate of Broadband connection is lowest for the $150- $249 income grouping. Generally, connectivity increases with income.

Table 5: Internet Access by Weekly Equivalised Household Income(a) - August 2006

Any Internet
Broadband connection
Total
Dwelling Records
Dwelling proportions
Dwelling Records
Dwelling proportions
Dwelling Records
no.
% of Dwellings
no.
% of Dwellings
no.

Nil or negative income(b)
43 456
57
30 553
40
76 863
$1-$149
65 080
45
40 136
28
144 566
$150-$249
177 092
35
97 293
19
509 077
$250-$399
476 199
41
260 106
22
1 157 919
$400-$599
695 317
60
407 042
35
1 150 684
$600-$799
684 942
70
424 101
43
980 944
$800-$999
504 333
76
327 540
49
666 924
$1000-$1299
554 724
80
377 487
55
690 055
$1300-$1599
320 272
84
227 470
60
381 170
$1600-$1999
199 738
87
148 501
64
230 449
$2000 or more
179 182
86
139 063
67
207 296

(a) Cells in this table have been randomly adjusted to avoid the release of confidential data.
(b) This income group consist of people with income from unincorporated enterprises or rental properties. The income may be reported negative when a loss accrues to a household as an owner or partner in unincorporated enterprise or rental property. Losses occur when operating expenses and depreciation are greater than gross receipts (ABS, 2007c). Thus this group can include people with considerable wealth.

Figure 16: Internet Access by Weekly Equivalised Household Income, (Broad Income Groups)
Graph: Figure 16: Internet Access by Weekly Equivalised Household Income, (Broad Income Groups)




5.2. Type of tenure

People with home with a mortgage have a significantly higher level of connectivity in comparison with Renters, Outright owners and Other tenure types.


Internet access by type of tenure show a large variation among the different types. The Being purchased mortgage category has the highest proportion of any Internet (80%) and Broadband (54%) connection.


The Being occupied under a life tenure scheme category show the lowest proportions of any Internet and Broadband connection. Dwellings occupied under a life tenure scheme includes arrangements in retirement homes.


The Fully owned and Being occupied rent-free categories show similar proportions.

Figure 17:Internet Access by Tenure Type of the Dwellings - August 2006
Graph: Figure 17:Internet Access by Tenure Type of the Dwellings—August 2006




5.3. Family and household characteristics

5.3.1 Family composition

Family composition classifies families into different types. In doing so, information about temporarily absent family member is also used. No provision has been made to classify family members outside the family nucleus. For example, in a family which contains a couple and their dependent children, plus a parent of one of the couple, the latter is recorded as an Other related individual. For details of the categories of family composition please see the Census Dictionary. Table 6 gives the summary of Internet access by the family composition in private occupied dwellings.

Table 6: Internet Access by the Composition of Families , in Private Occupied Dwellings - August 2006

Any Internet
Broadband connection
Family
Records
Proportions
of families
Family
Records
Proportions
of families
no.
%
no.
%

Couple family without children
1 186 865
63
724 407
38
Couple family with children under 15 and dependent students
255 918
92
189 536
68
Couple family with children under 15 and no dependent students
1 093 654
83
730 340
55
Couple family with no children under 15 and with dependent students
282 551
94
215 357
72
Couple family with no children under 15, no dependent students and with non-dependent children
316 262
75
210 926
50
One parent family with children under 15 and dependent students
51 203
77
34 722
52
One parent family with children under 15 and no dependent students
217 531
58
129 619
35
One parent family with no children under 15 and with dependent students
84 143
83
57 046
56
One parent family with no children under 15, no dependent students and with non-dependent children
136 921
54
81 409
32
Other family
50 315
59
34 176
40


Couple families with children under 15, with or without dependent students, recorded significantly higher connectivity than similar lone parent families, or couple families without children or students. Figure 18 presents Internet access broad level composition of families in private occupied dwellings. Dependent children includes both children under 15 and dependent students.

Figure 18: Internet Access by Family Composition - August 2006
Graph: Figure 18: Internet Access by Family Composition—August 2006



5.3.2 Family blending

Categories considered in this analysis relate to couple families only, based on the parent-child relationships within them.


The results indicate that blending of families have an impact on access to the Internet. Intact couple families with no other children present, recorded the highest proportion of any Internet (85%) and Broadband (58%) access (Figure 19). The lowest proportion of any Internet (62%) and Broadband (39%) access is recorded by the dwellings with Couple family with other children present. This category refers to couple families containing one or more children, all of whom are neither the natural children of either partner in the couple, nor step children of both partners in the couple. The presence of other children (such as foster children, or grandchildren) is associated with lower proportions of Internet access.

Figure 19: Internet Access by Couple Family Blendings, August 2006
Graph: Figure 19: Internet Access by Couple Family Blendings, August 2006



5.3.3 Household composition

A dwelling could consist of more than one family. Figure 20 illustrates the variation of proportions of Internet connectivity with respect to household composition. Two family households recorded the highest rate of any Internet (73%) and Broadband (50%) access. One family households recorded similar proportions to the two family household (72% any Internet and 47% Broadband). Lone person households have the lowest proportion of any Internet (37%) and Broadband (20%) access.

Figure 20: Internet Access by Household Composition - August 2006
Graph: Figure 20: Internet Access by Household Composition—August 2006







Previous PageNext Page