6265.0 - Underemployed Workers, Australia, Sep 2011 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 02/03/2012   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

TECHNICAL NOTE DATA QUALITY


INTRODUCTION

1 Estimates in this publication are based on information obtained from occupants of a sample of dwellings, and are subject to sampling variability. That is, they may differ from those estimates that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey. One measure of the likely difference is given by the standard error (SE), which indicates the extent to which an estimate might have varied by chance because only a sample of dwellings was included. There are about two chances in three (67%) that a sample estimate will differ by less than one SE from the number that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included, and about 19 chances in 20 (95%) that the difference will be less than two SEs. Another measure of the likely difference is the relative standard error (RSE), which is obtained by expressing the SE as a percentage of the estimate.

2 Due to space limitations, it is impractical to print the SE of each estimate in the publication. Instead, a table of SEs is provided to determine the SE for an estimate from the size of that estimate ( see table T1). The SE table is derived from a mathematical model, referred to as the 'SE model', which is created using data from a number of past Labour Force Surveys. It should be noted that the SE model only gives an approximate value for the SE for any particular estimate, since there is some minor variation between SEs for different estimates of the same size.


CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR

3 An example of the calculation and the use of SEs in relation to estimates of persons is as follows. Table 4 shows the estimated number of female underemployed part-time workers was 446,000. Since this estimate is between 300,000 and 500,000, table T1 shows that the SE for Australia will lie between 6,650 and 8,350 and can be approximated by interpolation using the following general formula:

Equation: Equation 1 test 2011

4 Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the value that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey will fall within the range 438,100 to 453,900 and about 19 chances in 20 that the value will fall within the range 430,200 to 461,800. This example is illustrated in the following diagram.

Diagram: CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR

5 In general, the size of the SE increases as the size of the estimate increases. Conversely, the RSE decreases as the size of the estimate increases. Very small estimates are thus subject to such high RSEs that their value for most practical purposes is unreliable. In the tables in this publication, only estimates with RSEs of 25% or less are considered reliable for most purposes. Estimates with RSEs greater than 25% but less than or equal to 50% are preceded by an asterisk (e.g.*3.2) to indicate they are subject to high SEs and should be used with caution. Estimates with RSEs of greater than 50%, preceded by a double asterisk (e.g.**0.3), are considered too unreliable for general use and should only be used to aggregate with other estimates to provide derived estimates with RSEs of less than 25%.


MEANS AND MEDIANS

6 The RSEs of estimates of mean duration of insufficient work, median duration of insufficient work and mean preferred number of extra hours are obtained by first finding the RSE of the estimate of the total number of persons contributing to the mean or median ( see table T1) and then multiplying the resulting number by the following factors:
  • mean duration of insufficient work: 1.6
  • median duration of insufficient work: 2.5
  • mean preferred number of extra hours: 0.7

7 The following is an example of the calculation of SEs where the use of a factor is required. Table 4 shows that the estimated number of male underemployed part-time workers was 276,600 with a median duration of insufficient work of 28 weeks. The SE of 276,600 can be calculated from table T1 (by interpolation) as 6,400. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate or 6,400/276,600 = 2.3%.

8 The RSE of the estimate of median duration of insufficient work is calculated by multiplying this number (2.3%) by the appropriate factor shown in paragraph 6 (in this case 2.5): 2.5 x 2.3 = 5.8%. The SE of this estimate of median duration of insufficient work is therefore 5.8% of 28, i.e. about 2 (rounded to the nearest whole week). Therefore, there are two chances in three that the median duration of insufficient work for males that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included in the survey would have been within the range 26-30 weeks, and about 19 chances in 20 that it would have been within the range 24-32 weeks.


PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES

9 Proportions and percentages formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends on the accuracy of both the numerator and the denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below. This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y.

Equation: Equation 2 tech note 2011 generic RSE

10 Considering the example from paragraph 3, of the 446,000 female underemployed part-time workers, 178,800 or 40.1% had insufficient work for 52 weeks and over. The SE of 178,800 may be calculated by interpolation as 5,300. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate, or 5,300/178,800 = 3.0%. The SE for 446,000 was calculated previously as 7,900, which converted to an RSE is 7,900/446,000 = 1.8%. Applying the above formula, the RSE of the proportion is:

Equation: Equation 3 tech note 2011

11 Therefore, the SE for the proportion of females who have a current period of insufficient work of 52 weeks or more is 1.0 percentage points (=(40.1/100)x2.4). Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the proportion of females who have a current period of insufficient work of 52 weeks or more was between 39.1% and 41.1% and 19 chances in 20 that the proportion is within the range 38.1% to 42.1%.


DIFFERENCES

12 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (of numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula:

Equation: Equation 4 tech note 2011 generic SE(x-y)

13 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication.


STANDARD ERRORS

T1 STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATES

AUST.
NSW
Vic.
Qld
SA
WA
Tas.
NT
ACT
SE
RSE
Size of Estimate (persons)
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
%

100
290
290
220
180
220
110
80
100
110
110.0
200
400
380
320
240
290
160
120
170
190
95.0
300
470
440
390
280
340
190
160
210
260
86.7
500
580
540
500
340
420
240
200
270
380
76.0
700
660
620
580
390
480
270
230
300
480
68.6
1000
760
710
680
450
550
310
270
330
610
61.0
1500
900
830
810
530
640
360
320
360
780
52.0
2000
1 010
930
910
590
710
390
350
390
920
46.0
2500
1 100
1 000
1 000
650
800
400
400
400
1 050
42.0
3000
1 200
1 100
1 050
700
850
450
400
450
1 150
38.3
3500
1 250
1 150
1 100
700
900
450
400
450
1 250
35.7
4000
1 300
1 200
1 200
750
900
500
450
450
1 350
33.8
5000
1 450
1 300
1 250
800
1 000
500
500
500
1 500
30.0
7000
1 650
1 500
1 450
900
1 150
600
600
600
1 700
24.3
10000
1 850
1 700
1 600
1 050
1 300
700
750
700
2 000
20.0
15000
2 150
1 950
1 800
1 200
1 500
850
1 050
850
2 350
15.7
20000
2 400
2 200
1 950
1 350
1 650
1 000
1 300
1 000
2 550
12.8
30000
2 800
2 550
2 250
1 550
1 900
1 250
1 850
1 250
2 900
9.7
40000
3 100
2 800
2 500
1 800
2 100
1 500
2 300
1 500
3 150
7.9
50000
3 350
3 050
2 750
2 000
2 300
1 700
2 750
1 650
3 400
6.8
100000
4 250
4 000
3 750
3 000
3 400
2 400
4 800
2 250
4 300
4.3
150000
5 000
4 850
4 600
3 850
4 450
2 850
6 600
2 500
5 000
3.3
200000
5 750
5 650
5 400
4 550
5 350
3 200
8 250
2 650
5 600
2.8
300000
7 250
7 250
6 850
5 550
6 750
3 700
11 250
2 800
6 650
2.2
500000
10 150
10 050
9 250
7 000
8 600
4 250
. .
2 800
8 350
1.7
1000000
15 100
15 250
13 200
8 900
10 950
4 850
. .
. .
11 750
1.2
2000000
20 350
22 550
17 700
10 600
12 700
. .
. .
. .
17 050
0.9
5000000
25 900
36 100
23 900
11 900
13 250
. .
. .
. .
28 450
0.6
10000000
27 750
49 750
27 950
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
37 950
0.4
15000000
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
42 850
0.3

. . not applicable

T2 LEVELS AT WHICH ESTIMATES HAVE RELATIVE STANDARD ERRORS OF 25% AND 50%(a)

NSW
Vic.
Qld
SA
WA
Tas.
NT
ACT
Aust.
Percentage
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.
no.

RSE of 25%
6 300
5 400
5 100
2 600
3 500
1 400
1 200
1 400
6 800
RSE of 50%
2 000
1 800
1 700
800
1 200
500
300
600
1 600

(a) Refers to the number of persons contributing to the estimate.