Australian Bureau of Statistics
6210.5 - Workforce Participation and Workplace Flexibility, Western Australia, October 2010 Quality Declaration
Latest ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 25/05/2011 First Issue
|Page tools: Print Page Print All RSS Search this Product|
TECHNICAL NOTE DATA QUALITY
4 RSEs for estimates from 2010 Workforce Participation and Workplace Flexibility survey are published for each individual data cell. The Jackknife method of variance estimation is used for this process, which involves the calculation of 30 'replicate' estimates based on sub-samples of the original sample. The variability of estimates obtained from these sub-samples is used to estimate the sample variability surrounding the main estimate.
5 Limited publication space does not allow for the separate indication of the SEs and/or RSEs of all the estimates in this publication. However, RSEs for all these estimates will be available free-of-charge on the ABS web site <www.abs.gov.au>.
6 In the tables in this publication, only estimates (numbers and proportions) with RSEs less than 25% are considered sufficiently reliable for most purposes. However, estimates with larger RSEs have been included and are preceded by an asterisk (e.g. *3.4) to indicate they are subject to high uncertainty and should be used with caution. Estimates with RSEs greater than 50% are preceded by a double asterisk (e.g. **2.1) to indicate that they are considered too unreliable for general use.
7 The estimates in this publication were obtained using a post-stratification procedure. This procedure ensured that the survey estimates conformed to an independently estimated distribution of the population, by state, part of state, age and sex rather than the observed distribution among respondents.
PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES
8 Proportions formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends on the accuracy of both the numerator and the denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below. This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y.
9 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (of numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the statistical association (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula:
10 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication.
11 A statistical significance test can be performed to indicate whether the survey results provide sufficient evidence that differences between survey estimates reflect an actual difference in the population. The following measure, called a "test statistic", can be used to test the statistical significance of a difference between two survey estimates. (The standard error of the difference between two corresponding estimates (x and y) can be calculated using the formula in paragraph 9).
12 If the value of this test statistic is greater than 1.96, then we may say there is strong evidence the difference between the survey estimates reflects there is a difference in the population.
These documents will be presented in a new window.
This page last updated 24 May 2011