TECHNICAL NOTE DATA QUALITY
INTRODUCTION
1 Since the estimates in this publication are based on information obtained from occupants of a sample of dwellings, they are subject to sampling variability. That is, they may differ from those estimates that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey. One measure of the likely difference is given by the standard error (SE), which indicates the extent to which an estimate might have varied by chance because only a sample of dwellings was included. There are about two chances in three (67%) that a sample estimate will differ by less than one SE from the number that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included, and about 19 chances in 20 (95%) that the difference will be less than two SEs. Another measure of the likely difference is the relative standard error (RSE), which is obtained by expressing the SE as a percentage of the estimate.
2 Due to space limitations, it is impractical to print the SE of each estimate in the publication. Instead, a table of SEs is provided to enable readers to determine the SE for an estimate from the size of that estimate (see table T1). The SE table is derived from a mathematical model, referred to as the 'SE model', which is created using data from a number of past Labour Force Surveys. It should be noted that the SE model only gives an approximate value for the SE for any particular estimate, since there is some minor variation between SEs for different estimates of the same size.
3 The LFS sample size in July 2008 was approximately one-third smaller than the sample size in July 2007. This is due to an 11% sample reduction that was implemented from November 2007 to June 2008 based on the 2006 sample design, and an additional 24% sample reduction implemented in July 2008. In combination, the two sample reductions are expected to increase the standard errors for estimates from the supplementary surveys by approximately 22% at the broad aggregate level, relative to the 2001 sample design (standard errors will vary at lower aggregate levels). Detailed information about the sample reduction is provided in Information Paper: Labour Force Survey Sample Design, Nov 2007 (Second edition) (cat. no. 6269.0).
CALCULATION OF STANDARD ERROR
4 An example of the calculation and the use of SEs in relation to estimates of persons is as follows. Table 4 shows the estimated number of unemployed women in Australia who were looking for full-time work was 128,500. Since this estimate is between 100,000 and 150,000, table T1 shows that the SE for Australia will lie between 4,900 and 5,700 and can be approximated by interpolation using the following general formula:
5 Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the value that would have been produced if all dwellings had been included in the survey will fall within the range 123,100 to 133,900 and about 19 chances in 20 that the value will fall within the range 117,700 to 139,300. This example is illustrated in the diagram below.
6 In general, the size of the SE increases as the size of the estimate increases. Conversely, the RSE decreases as the size of the estimate increases. Very small estimates are thus subject to such high RSEs that their value for most practical purposes is unreliable. In the tables in this publication, only estimates with RSEs of 25% or less are considered reliable for most purposes. Estimates with RSEs greater than 25% but less than or equal to 50% are preceded by an asterisk (e.g. *3.4) to indicate they are subject to high SEs and should be used with caution. Estimates with RSEs of greater than 50%, preceded by a double asterisk (e.g. **0.3), are considered too unreliable for general use and should only be used to aggregate with other estimates to provide derived estimates with RSEs of less than 25%. Table T2 presents the levels at which estimates have RSEs of 25% and 50%.
MEANS AND MEDIANS
7 The RSEs of estimates of mean duration of unemployment and median duration of unemployment are obtained by first finding the RSE of the estimate of the total number of persons contributing to the mean or median (see table T1) and then multiplying the resulting number by the following factors for Australian estimates:
- mean duration of unemployment: 1.6
- median duration of unemployment: 2.5
8 The following is an example of the calculation of SEs where the use of a factor is required. Table 4 shows that the estimated median duration of unemployment for unemployed women in Australia was 10 weeks and shows that the number of unemployed women was estimated as 216,000. The SE of 216,000 can be calculated from table T1 (by interpolation) as 6,600. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate or 6,600/216 000 =3.1%.
9 The RSE of the estimate of median duration of unemployment for unemployed women is calculated by multiplying this number (3.1%) by the appropriate factor shown in the previous paragraph (in this case 2.5): 3.1 x 2.5 = 7.8%. The SE of this estimate of median duration of unemployment for unemployed women is therefore 7.8% of 10 weeks, i.e. almost one week. Therefore, there are two chances in three that the median duration of unemployment for women that would have been obtained if all dwellings had been included in the survey would have been within the range 9 to 11 weeks and about 19 chances in 20 that it would have been within the range 8 weeks to 12 weeks.
10 Table T2 represents the minimum size of estimates, based on the SE model described in paragraph 2, required to have RSEs of less than 25% and 50% respectively. For example, an estimate of median duration of unemployment for Australia based on less than 35,100 people will have an RSE of at least 25%, and an estimate of median duration of unemployment for Australia based on less than 12,500 will have an RSE of at least 50%. For all other estimates, (i.e. those estimates based purely on number of people in a specific category), an estimate of less than 8,600 for the Australian total will have an RSE of at least 25% and an estimate of less than 5,700 will have an RSE of at least 50%.
PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES
11 Proportions and percentages formed from the ratio of two estimates are also subject to sampling errors. The size of the error depends on the accuracy of both the numerator and the denominator. A formula to approximate the RSE of a proportion is given below. This formula is only valid when x is a subset of y:
12 Considering the example from the previous page, of the 128,500 unemployed women who were looking for full-time work, 19,800 or 15.4% had been unemployed for one year or more. The SE of 19,800 may be calculated by interpolation as 2,900. To convert this to an RSE we express the SE as a percentage of the estimate, or 2,900/19,800 = 14.7%. The SE for 128,500 was calculated previously as 5,400, which converted to an RSE is 5,400/128,500 = 4.2%. Applying the above formula, the RSE of the proportion is:
13 Therefore, the SE for the proportion of unemployed women looking for full-time work who had been unemployed for one year or more is 2.2 percentage points (=(15.4/100)x14.1). Therefore, there are about two chances in three that the proportion of unemployed women looking for full-time work who have been unemployed for one year or more is between 13.2% and 17.6% and 19 chances in 20 that the proportion is within the range 11.0% to 19.8%.
DIFFERENCES
14 Published estimates may also be used to calculate the difference between two survey estimates (of numbers or percentages). Such an estimate is subject to sampling error. The sampling error of the difference between two estimates depends on their SEs and the relationship (correlation) between them. An approximate SE of the difference between two estimates (x-y) may be calculated by the following formula:
15 While this formula will only be exact for differences between separate and uncorrelated characteristics or subpopulations, it is expected to provide a good approximation for all differences likely to be of interest in this publication.
STANDARD ERRORS
T1 STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATES |
| |
| NSW | Vic. | Qld. | SA | WA | Tas. | NT | ACT | Australia | |
Size of estimate (persons) | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | % | |
| |
100 | 340 | 330 | 250 | 200 | 250 | 130 | 90 | 120 | 120 | 120.0 | |
200 | 450 | 430 | 370 | 270 | 330 | 180 | 140 | 190 | 220 | 110.0 | |
300 | 540 | 510 | 450 | 320 | 390 | 220 | 170 | 240 | 300 | 100.0 | |
500 | 660 | 620 | 570 | 390 | 480 | 270 | 220 | 310 | 440 | 88.0 | |
700 | 760 | 710 | 670 | 450 | 550 | 310 | 260 | 350 | 550 | 78.6 | |
1,000 | 880 | 810 | 780 | 520 | 630 | 360 | 300 | 380 | 700 | 70.0 | |
1,500 | 1 030 | 950 | 930 | 600 | 730 | 410 | 350 | 420 | 890 | 59.3 | |
2,000 | 1 150 | 1 060 | 1 040 | 670 | 820 | 450 | 390 | 440 | 1 050 | 52.5 | |
2,500 | 1 250 | 1 150 | 1 150 | 750 | 900 | 500 | 400 | 450 | 1 200 | 48.0 | |
3,000 | 1 350 | 1 250 | 1 200 | 800 | 950 | 500 | 450 | 500 | 1 300 | 43.3 | |
3,500 | 1 450 | 1 300 | 1 300 | 800 | 1 000 | 550 | 450 | 500 | 1 400 | 40.0 | |
4,000 | 1 500 | 1 400 | 1 350 | 850 | 1 050 | 550 | 500 | 550 | 1 500 | 37.5 | |
5,000 | 1 650 | 1 500 | 1 450 | 950 | 1 150 | 600 | 550 | 600 | 1 700 | 34.0 | |
7,000 | 1 850 | 1 700 | 1 650 | 1 050 | 1 300 | 700 | 650 | 650 | 1 950 | 27.9 | |
10,000 | 2 150 | 1 950 | 1 850 | 1 200 | 1 500 | 800 | 800 | 800 | 2 300 | 23.0 | |
15,000 | 2 500 | 2 250 | 2 050 | 1 350 | 1 700 | 950 | 1 150 | 950 | 2 650 | 17.7 | |
20,000 | 2 750 | 2 500 | 2 250 | 1 500 | 1 900 | 1 150 | 1 450 | 1 100 | 2 950 | 14.8 | |
30,000 | 3 200 | 2 900 | 2 600 | 1 800 | 2 150 | 1 450 | 2 000 | 1 450 | 3 350 | 11.2 | |
40,000 | 3 550 | 3 200 | 2 850 | 2 050 | 2 400 | 1 700 | 2 500 | 1 700 | 3 650 | 9.1 | |
50,000 | 3 850 | 3 500 | 3 150 | 2 300 | 2 650 | 1 950 | 3 000 | 1 900 | 3 900 | 7.8 | |
100,000 | 4 900 | 4 550 | 4 300 | 3 450 | 3 900 | 2 750 | 5 250 | 2 550 | 4 900 | 4.9 | |
150,000 | 5 750 | 5 550 | 5 300 | 4 400 | 5 150 | 3 300 | 7 200 | 2 900 | 5 700 | 3.8 | |
200,000 | 6 600 | 6 450 | 6 200 | 5 200 | 6 150 | 3 700 | 9 000 | 3 050 | 6 400 | 3.2 | |
300,000 | 8 300 | 8 300 | 7 850 | 6 400 | 7 750 | 4 200 | 12 250 | 3 200 | 7 600 | 2.5 | |
500,000 | 11 650 | 11 500 | 10 600 | 8 000 | 9 850 | 4 850 | . . | 3 200 | 9 550 | 1.9 | |
1,000,000 | 17 300 | 17 500 | 15 150 | 10 200 | 12 600 | 5 550 | . . | . . | 13 450 | 1.3 | |
2,000,000 | 23 300 | 25 850 | 20 350 | 12 100 | 14 550 | . . | . . | . . | 19 550 | 1.0 | |
5,000,000 | 29 700 | 41 350 | 27 450 | 13 650 | 15 200 | . . | . . | . . | 32 600 | 0.7 | |
10,000,000 | 31 800 | 57 000 | 32 100 | . . | . . | . . | . . | . . | 43 500 | 0.4 | |
15,000,000 | . . | . . | . . | . . | . . | . . | . . | . . | 49 100 | 0.3 | |
| |
. . not applicable |
T2 Levels at which estimates have relative standard errors of 25% and 50%(a) |
| |
| NSW | Vic. | Qld | SA | WA | Tas. | NT | ACT | Aust. | |
| no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | no. | |
25% RSE | |
| |
Mean duration of unemployment | 13 900 | 11 700 | 10 600 | 5 400 | 7 700 | 2 800 | 1 900 | 2 900 | 18 100 | |
Median duration of unemployment | 36 800 | 31 800 | 27 800 | 14 800 | 22 300 | 10 300 | 6 400 | 8 500 | 35 100 | |
All other estimates | 7 800 | 6 700 | 6 300 | 3 200 | 4 400 | 1 700 | 1 300 | 1 700 | 8 600 | |
50% RSE | |
| |
Mean duration of unemployment | 4 600 | 3 900 | 3 700 | 1 800 | 2 600 | 1 000 | 600 | 1 200 | 5 700 | |
Median duration of unemployment | 12 400 | 10 700 | 10 200 | 5 100 | 7 600 | 3 400 | 2 100 | 2 800 | 12 500 | |
All other estimates | 2 500 | 2 200 | 2 100 | 1 000 | 1 400 | 600 | 400 | 700 | 2 300 | |
| |
(a) Refers to the number of people contributing to the estimate. |
Follow us on...
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram ABS RSS feed Subscribe to ABS updates