Australian Bureau of Statistics
6105.0 - Australian Labour Market Statistics, Jul 2003
Previous ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 04/07/2003
|Page tools: Print Page Print All RSS Search this Product|
Feature Article - Unemployment and participation rates in Australia: a cohort analysis
During periods of economic growth the unemployment rate tends to fall, while the unemployment rate rises during recessionary periods when there is a reduction in the demand for labour. Figure 2 shows the effect the year had on unemployment, after controlling for age and cohort effects — the coefficients of the year effect are expressed in percentage point changes from the average unemployment rate over the period.
The year effect follows the pattern of the business cycle shown in Figure 1, with peaks in unemployment in the early 1980s and early 1990s — roughly corresponding with the years of recession, though tending to lag the troughs of the recession slightly.
When compared to men, unemployment among women seems less strongly associated with the business cycle, as the peaks and troughs tend to be less extreme. This corresponds with other studies which show that during recessionary periods unemployed men tend to stay in the labour force while unemployed women tend to exit the labour force (e.g. Gregory, R. (1991), 'Jobs and Gender: A Lego Approach to the Australian Labour Market', Economic Record, 67 (supplement), pp 20-40.).
Figure 3 shows the year effect for men and women's labour force participation. Comparison with figure 1 shows that women's labour force participation roughly follows the business cycle, with troughs at similar points, although the participation rate for women has varied less since the early 1990s. The year effect for men is not statistically significant, indicating the male participation rate (unlike unemployment) is not strongly influenced by the business cycle. Women's decisions to participate in the labour market appear to be more strongly influenced by the economic cycle than men's, as noted above. This may reflect a propensity to exit the labour market rather than remain unemployed when jobs become harder to find.
THE EFFECT OF AGE
The relationship between age and unemployment, after controlling for year and cohort effects, is shown in Figure 4. Younger workers, who have only recently entered the labour market, experience higher levels of unemployment than middle aged workers, who are better established in employment. Among men, the relationship between age and unemployment remains relatively steady until their early 50s when it begins to rise, peaking at age 59. The age effects for women are considerably different, with the unemployment rate continuing to decline after age 50. Again this could be explained by women being more likely to exit the labour market than to remain unemployed. The sharp drop in unemployment rates among both men and women close to age 60 may be attributed to workers retiring from the labour market.
The relationship between age and participation, after controlling for year and cohort effects, is shown in Figure 5. Among men, labour force participation gradually declines with age until they reach their mid 50s, at which point it begins to decline more sharply. The participation rate for women is lower during the years that many women have children — around 25 to 35 years of age — but then increases until age 50, when it then falls in a similar manner to the male rate. The lower participation rates for people aged over 50 could be attributed to various factors, including voluntary early retirement, health problems, and choosing to leave the labour force rather than remain unemployed.
THE EFFECT OF THE COHORT
When compared to the age and year effects, the influence someone's cohort group has on their chances of being unemployed is relatively small (see Figure 6). However, the cohort effect for unemployment is statistically significant for men.
The male cohort effect indicates that, after controlling for age and year effects, older cohorts (that is, men born before around 1945) experienced, on average, lower unemployment rates than their younger counterparts. For example, over the 20 year period, the unemployment rate for men in the 1956 birth cohort is around 0.2 percentage points higher on average than the unemployment rate for men born in 1937.
The cohort effect on unemployment rates was stronger for unskilled men than skilled men, as shown in Figure 7. Here, the skilled group is defined as comprising people who completed high school as well as those who received some post school qualification. Among skilled men, there was little difference between the cohorts. The unskilled group comprised those who did not complete high school. The results show that, after controlling for the effects of age and year, unemployment tended to be higher among unskilled men from later generations.
Figure 8 shows the relationship between a person's cohort and their chances of participating in the labour force. Although the cohort effect is significant for both men and women, it is much stronger for women. After controlling for age and year effects, men born in 1937 experienced participation rates 3 percentage points higher on average over the period than men born in 1956. Conversely, women born in 1936 experienced participation rates 23 percentage points lower on average than women born in 1956, after controlling for age and year effects.
Changing employment opportunities for women resulting from changing social attitudes may help to explain the increasing trend in labour market participation among younger cohorts. Employment growth between 1981 and 2001 has been skewed towards females. Between 1981 and 2001, female employment as a proportion of total employment increased from 37% to 45%. The driving force behind this growth in female employment is from increased part-time employment, especially in the services sector.
For more information about the analysis please contact Ravi Ravindiran on Canberra 02 6252 7039, or via email at <Ravi.Ravindiran@abs.gov.au>. For information about the Labour Force Survey please contact Peter Bradbury on Canberra 02 6252 6565, or via email at <Peter.Bradbury@abs.gov.au>
These documents will be presented in a new window.
This page last updated 5 April 2011