Australian Bureau of Statistics
5609.0 - Housing Finance for Owner Occupation, Australia, 2002
Previous ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 10/05/2002
|Page tools: Print Page Print All RSS Search this Product|
Feature Article - Recent trends in construction and first home buyer finance
The construction finance trend series growth has only recently ended, with the trend having declined marginally from December 2001. The first home buyers series strength ended some months earlier, with the trend peaking in August 2001 and declining since.
Reflecting the national trend, most States' construction finance trends declined from very high levels in late 1999 to troughs in late 2000, before rising to new peaks between October 2001 (NSW) and February 2002 (for Tasmania, West Australia, and South Australia, where the trend continued to rise). The Tasmanian construction finance trend has been unusual, with its cycle delayed by several months compared with most states, peaking in March 2000 and then declining until May 2001.
To illustrate the depth of the construction finance trough in 2000, an index was formulated for each State, where the peak level of the construction finance trend in late 1999 was scaled to 1.00, and then two relative indexes created: one for the following trough, and another for the subsequent peak (or the most recent month where the series was still increasing). As illustrated in Graph 2, most States declined to a level of between 0.50 and 0.60 times the late 1999 peak, with the depth of the trough greatest in the NT and the ACT (0.32 and 0.43 times the 1999 peak respectively). The two territories had barely emerged from the low point of late 2000, with the most recent peak at a level just 0.56 times the high of late 1999.
On the other hand, Queensland responded most strongly to the construction finance stimulus throughout 2001, climbing to a recent high which was 1.29 times its previous peak in November 1999. The Tasmanian construction finance trend was still increasing, and at February 2002 was 1.21 times its March 2000 peak, although the first peak was a three year high, compared with a five year high for the December 1999 national peak.
The Housing Finance collection does not require lenders to report on construction finance commitments by FHBs. Total commitments by lenders are reported by the purpose of the commitment (construction finance or some other purpose), and by the type of borrower (FHB or not). Therefore definitive statements about commitments to FHBs for construction finance cannot be made.
Graph 3 shows that NSW and Queensland stand out for the much larger increases in the FHB trend compared with the increases in the construction finance trend from January 2001 until the month in which the FHB trend peaked in the respective States. The bigger increases in the FHB trends are likely to be due to increases in non-construction finance, which is dominated by established dwelling finance. South Australia was unusual in that strength in the FHB trend in the months from January 2001 to its peak was minimal relative to growth in the construction finance trend over the same period. This suggests that increases in construction finance commitments drew more heavily on non-FHBs than FHBs in that State.
New South Wales
The FHB series trend increased steadily and with some strength from April 2000 until a peak at August 2001, although it did not respond as quickly as in some other States to the stimuli of July 2000 and March 2001. The construction finance trend fell to a low in December 2000, in line with other States, although its recovery since then reached just 0.82 times its high of October 1999.
The FHB trend series for Victoria rose strongly from April 2000, mainly due to the unusual strength in the original series in July and August 2000, with the introduction of the GST. There was a jump to a new level in May 2001, occurring just after the extension of the FHOG in March 2001. The construction trend increased strongly from its low in December 2000, to surpass the previous peak of December 1999.
The Queensland FHB trend reacted very strongly to the July 2000 introduction of the FHOG, and again in May 2001 after the extension of the FHOG, with trend breaks evident in these months. The construction finance trend declined from January 2000 to September 2000, then increased slowly until jumping to a new level in May 2001. The Queensland construction finance trend series increased most strongly of all the States from its September 2000 low, reaching a level 1.29 times the December 1999 peak in February 2002.
The South Australia FHB trend reacted extremely strongly alongside the July 2000 introduction of the FHOG, increasing by 448 commitments (95%). While the construction finance trend increased by 128 commitments (39%) in May 2001, the corresponding growth in the FHB trend was weak relative to other States, increasing by just 74 commitments (9.7%) from the low of March 2001 to the high of July 2001.
The Western Australia FHB trend saw two large increases at July 2000 and May 2001, coinciding with the introduction of the FHOG and its extension. The state graphs mirrored the national trend, although their relative strength was greater. The jump in May 2001 was accompanied by a sharp increase in the construction finance trend.
The Tasmania FHB trend increased by 109 commitments (108%) in July 2000, and then increased strongly from January 2001. The construction finance trend behaved unusually in Tasmania, peaking later (in May 2000) and then reaching its low several months later than most other States (in March 2001). As illustrated in Graph 2 above, the construction finance trough was the least deep of all the States, and the trend then outgrew the previous peak by a factor of 1.21 times.
Northern Territory and the ACT
The pattern of the FHB and the construction finance trends for the NT and the ACT were very similar. In neither territory was any sustained increase in the FHB trend observed in July 2000, with the trend falling continuously from late 1999. The construction finance trend peaked in October 1999 (NT) and December 1999 (ACT) and then declined relatively more than for any other State, to a level just 0.32 (NT) and 0.43 (ACT) times the previous peak. The recovery from late 2000 has been weakest in the NT and the ACT, with the construction finance trend increasing to a level of just 0.56 times the previous peak.
The series used in this analysis were those published on 12 April 2002. The original, seasonally adjusted, and trend series for construction finance and first home buyers finance, by State, from January 1999 until February 2002 inclusive, can be found in the following spreadsheet.
These documents will be presented in a new window.
This page last updated 29 May 2012