|Page tools: Print Page Print All RSS Search this Product|
Risk factors in early childhood are often cumulative and many persist or multiply as a child grows older.1 One of these risk factors is socioeconomic disadvantage. Household income, parental employment and parental educational attainment can be used as measures of a child's socioeconomic status. Children's preschool participation tends to increase in line with household income. In 2001, preschool participation rates ranged from 49% of four year olds from households in the lowest income quintile to 66% of those from households in the highest income quintile.
PRESCHOOL PARTICIPATION RATE(a)(b),
by household income, 2001
(a) Children aged four years.
(b) People who stated they attended school but did not indicate the type were excluded prior to calculation of percentages.
(c) See Australian Social Trends 2004, Economic resources: definitions,
Source: ABS 2001 Census of Population and Housing.
As parental employment (and income) increases, preschool becomes more affordable and, in addition to its educational role, may also become increasingly useful as a form of child care. In 2001, the four year olds least likely to attend preschool (with a participation rate of 47%) were those in couple families where neither parent was employed, and those from one-parent families in which the parent was not employed (48%). Participation rates were higher for four year olds from families with one parent employed (54% for one-parent families and 58% for couple families). The lower rate for one-parent families may reflect relative affordability as well as demand. Children aged four years in couple families with both parents employed were the most likely to attend preschool (61%).
A low level of parental education has been identified as being associated with lower preschool participation.1 In 2001, participation of four year olds at preschool was highest when a parent had a Bachelor degree or above (65%), decreasing to 49% for those whose parent(s) left school before Year 12.
This article is abridged from the article Attending Preschool in Australian Social Trends, 2004 (cat. no. 4102.0).
1 Commonwealth Task Force on Child Development, Health and Wellbeing 2003, Towards the development for a national agenda for early childhood, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
CHILDREN LIVING WITHOUT AN EMPLOYED PARENT
Children living without an employed parent are seen by many as an at-risk group. In particular, not having an employed parent is regarded as an indicator of risk of socioeconomic disadvantage for children (and families). Children living in these circumstances for extended periods may not have a role model of employment to follow and may be more likely to have outcomes such as welfare dependency and diminished economic success in the long term. However, in some cases, such as when the parent chooses to be without a job to care for children, there may also be positive effects for children living without an employed parent.
There are a range of issues to consider, and complexities, in creating an appropriate measure to indicate the number of children in this at-risk group. These include selecting a unit of analysis (household, full family or parent(s) and child), a measure of joblessness (unemployment or non-employment), and defining what is meant by 'children' (0-14 years or some other definition). Each of the potential measurement choices has advantages and disadvantages and may under- or over-state the number of children at risk. The measure preferred by the ABS is children living without an employed parent.
There are several ABS surveys that provide information on children living without an employed parent, including the Survey of Income and Housing Costs (SIHC), Census of Population and Housing, Labour Force Survey and the General Social Survey. The SIHC is used as the basis of the analysis below – it is conducted more frequently than the Census of Population and Housing and, unlike the Labour Force Survey and General Social Survey, is designed to produce reliable estimates of numbers of children.
In 2000-01 there were 678,100 (17%) children living without an employed parent. One parent families are the main group of families without an employed parent. Over half of all children living with one parent (58%) and 7% of all children living with two parents were living without an employed parent. In one parent families, the age of the youngest child appears to be a factor in whether or not the parent is employed. In one parent families where the youngest child was under five years of age, 79% of children were living without an employed parent. This compares with 46% of children in one parent families where the youngest child was aged 5-14 years. In contrast, in two parent families the proportion of children without an employed parent was similar when the youngest child was under five years (8%) or 5-14 years (7%).
CHILDREN LIVING WITHOUT AN EMPLOYED PARENT(a),
By family type and age of youngest child, 2000-01
(a) Refers to the labour force status of parent(s) living in the same household as the children at the time of interview.
Source: Data available on request, Survey of Income and Housing Costs.
Further details on this topic are available in two recently produced articles. The article in Australian Labour Market Statistics (cat. no. 6105.0) provides a full examination of the concepts and issues along with recent trends, while the article produced in Australian Social Trends (cat. no. 4102.0) describes the characteristics of families with no employed parent, their social wellbeing and financial stress.
These documents will be presented in a new window.