4610.0.55.007 - Water and the Murray-Darling Basin - A Statistical Profile, 2000-01 to 2005-06  
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 15/08/2008  First Issue
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All  
Contents >> Water use in the Murray-Darling Basin >> Agriculture Water Consumption

AGRICULTURAL WATER CONSUMPTION

This section of the chapter provides a detailed analysis of agricultural water consumption in the MDB and covers four topics:

  • water sources used for agricultural activity;
  • changes in agricultural water consumption over time;
  • regional agricultural water consumption; and
  • irrigation practices in the MDB.


Water Sources

The source of water used for agricultural production is of interest to policy makers and water resource managers (see Appendix). Issues that are of particular interest include:
  • whether water sources (e.g. groundwater) are being overused relative to the volume of available water;
  • the location of high and low levels of surface or groundwater consumption;
  • change in the levels of surface and groundwater consumption, and change in the ratio of surface to groundwater consumption;
  • the degree of water connectivity between surface and groundwater systems; and
  • the replacement of existing sources (e.g. surface or groundwater) with the use of alternative or 'new' water sources (e.g. recycled water).

Surface and groundwater sources

In 2005–06, the majority of water consumption by the Agriculture industry in the MDB originated from two main sources: surface water (6,499 GL) and groundwater (1,069 GL) (table 3.11). Combined, these two sources accounted for 98% of all water consumed for agricultural production in the Basin: 84% surface water, 14% groundwater. Other sources accounting for the remaining 2% of water consumption included recycled or reused water from off-farm sources and reticulated mains supply.

Although 14% of all agricultural water consumption inside the MDB was sourced from groundwater, areas outside the MDB were more reliant on groundwater, with 33% of water consumption originating from this source.

As shown in table 1.9, the long-term average annual run-off (23,609 GL) and deep drainage (9,719 GL) produce the long-term average water availability in the MDB of 33,328 GL. In 2005-06, agricultural water consumption was 7,720 GL (table 3.11), or 23% of the long-term average water availability in the MDB. Nation-wide, agricultural water consumption (11,689 GL) represents 3% of Australia's long-term average water availability (413,264 GL).

As a proportion of long-term average annual run-off in the MDB (table 1.9), surface water consumption by Agriculture represented 28% in 2005–06. In contrast, groundwater consumption (1,069 GL) represented 11% of the long-term average annual deep drainage.

3.11 Agricultural water consumption, by source—Murray-Darling Basin—2005–06

Surface water
Groundwater
Other sources(a)
Total water consumption
Proportion of total water consumption
Proportion of total water consumption
Proportion of total water consumption
Proportion of total water consumption
GL
%
GL
%
GL
%
GL
%

Murray-Darling Basin
New South Wales
3 680
82
762
17
44
1
4 486
100
Victoria
1 923
90
151
7
62
3
2 136
100
Queensland
550
82
109
16
12
2
671
100
South Australia
345
81
47
11
34
8
426
100
Australian Capital Territory
1
87
-
3
-
10
1
100
Total
6 499
84
1 069
14
152
2
7 720
100
Balance of Australia
2 498
63
1 323
33
148
4
3 969
100
Australia
8 997
77
2 392
20
300
3
11 689
100

- nil or rounded to zero (including null cells)
(a) Includes recycled/reuse water and town or country reticulated mains supply.
Source: Water use on Australian farms, 2005–06 (cat. no. 4618.0)


Location of surface and groundwater use

In 2005-06, the majority of surface water consumption by the Agriculture industry in the MDB was in New South Wales (57%) and Victoria (30%). Over 70% of the 1,069 GL of groundwater consumption in the MDB occurred in New South Wales (table 3.12). A relatively low volume of groundwater (151 GL or 14%) was extracted for consumption by the Agriculture industry in the Victoria section of the Basin.

3.12 Agricultural water consumption, by source and Basin state—Murray-Darling Basin—2005–06

Surface water
Groundwater
Water consumption
Proportion of MDB
    Water consumption
Proportion of MDB
GL
%
GL
%

New South Wales
3 680
57
762
71
Victoria
1 923
30
151
14
Queensland
550
8
109
10
South Australia
345
5
47
4
Australian Capital Territory
1
-
-
-
Murray-Darling Basin(a)
6 499
100
1 069
100

- nil or rounded to zero (including null cells)
(a) Components may not add to total due to rounding.
Source: Water use on Australian farms, 2005–06 (cat. no. 4618.0)

River basin scale measurement of water use from surface and groundwater sources is important for water management and planning agencies, because water management plans and water resource assessments commonly report at this level. Of the approximately 6,500 GL sourced from surface water in the MDB in 2005-06, most was from the Murrumbidgee (1,446 GL), Murray-Riverina (850 GL), Loddon (643 GL) and Goulburn (417 GL) river basins (table 3.14). These are also the basins with the highest total agricultural water consumption.

Map 3.13 illustrates the volumes of surface water used for agricultural production in MDB Statistical Local Areas (SLAs, see map E.2 in the Explanatory Notes) in 2005-06. The data was sourced from the ABS Agricultural Census. This level of geography has been used to provide a more detailed picture of the distribution of surface water consumption relative to river basins in the MDB. The pattern demonstrates that in 2005-06, surface water was consumed in most Basin SLAs, and that the highest quantities of water consumption were in SLAs in the southern and northern MDB.

3.13 Agricultural surface water consumption in river basins, by Statistical Local Area—Murray-Darling Basin—2005-06
Diagram: 4.12 Agricultural surface water consumption in river basins, by Statistical Local Area—Murray-Darling Basin – 2005–06


In 2005–06, groundwater accounted for 14% (or 1,069 GL) of agricultural water consumption in the MDB. Most of the water sourced from groundwater in the Basin occurred in the Murrumbidgee (218 GL), Namoi (185 GL) and Lachlan (144 GL) river basins (table 3.14). Groundwater was a more important water source to farmers in the Namoi and Lachlan river basins than other river basins, contributing 41% and 38% of total water consumption respectively). Within these river basins, groundwater consumption was spread across the Namoi river basin SLAs, while for the Murrumbidgee and Lachlan river basins, most groundwater consumption occurred in the SLAs located in the lower regions (see map 3.15 sourced from the Agricultural Census).

3.14 Agricultural water consumption in selected river basins, by source—Murray-Darling Basin—2005-06

Surface water
Groundwater
Other sources(a)
Total water consumption
Volume
Proportion of total water consumption
Volume
Proportion of total water consumption
Volume
Proportion of total water consumption
Volume
Proportion of total water consumption
GL
%
GL
%
GL
%
GL
%

Murrumbidgee
1 446
86
218
13
14
1
1 678
100
Murray-Riverina
850
90
91
10
5
1
946
100
Loddon
643
95
25
4
13
2
681
100
Broken
399
85
58
12
12
2
470
100
Goulburn
417
90
31
7
16
3
464
100
Namoi
260
57
185
41
12
3
456
100
Condamine-Culgoa
335
76
99
22
7
2
441
100
Lachlan river
233
61
144
38
2
1
380
100
Macquarie-Bogan
180
73
66
27
1
-
246
100
Other river basins
1 735
89
153
8
70
4
1 959
100
Murray-Darling Basin(b)
6 499
84
1 069
14
152
2
7 720
100

- nil or rounded to zero (including null cells)
(a) Includes recycled/reuse water and town or country reticulated mains supply.
(b) Components may not add to total due to rounding.
Source: ABS data available on request, Agricultural Census, 2005–06

3.15 Agricultural groundwater consumption in river basins, by Statistical Local Area—Murray-Darling Basin—2005–06
Diagram: 4.14 Agricultural groundwater consumption in river basins, by Statistical Local Area—Murray-Darling Basin—2005–06


Change in water sources

Comparable agricultural surface and groundwater consumption data are not available for the MDB before 2005–06. However, as table 3.16 shows, of the total state surface and groundwater consumption, the MDB section of New South Wales accounts for 94% of both sources. Therefore, assessing the change in surface and groundwater consumption in New South Wales between 2004-05 and 2005-06 would be indicative of the change in the New South Wales section of the MDB. In other states (Victoria, Queensland and South Australia), the proportion of surface and groundwater consumption in the MDB as a proportion of the total state, are lower. Therefore, assessing the change in surface and groundwater consumption in those states is less indicative of the change in the MDB section of each respective state.

3.16 Agricultural water consumption, by source—2005-06

Surface water
Groundwater
MDB
Total state/territory
MDB as a proportion of total state/territory
MDB
Total state/territory
MDB as a proportion of total state/territory
GL
GL
%
GL
GL
%

New South Wales
3 680
3 921
94
762
810
94
Victoria
1 923
2 254
85
151
297
51
Queensland
550
1 853
30
109
674
16
South Australia
345
448
77
47
459
10
Australian Capital Territory
1
1
100
-
-
-

- nil or rounded to zero (including null cells)
Source: ABS data available on request, Agricultural Census, 2005–06


The change in surface and groundwater consumption in New South Wales from 2004-05 to 2005-06 is shown in table 3.17. The volume of groundwater extracted by farmers decreased from almost 950 GL (25% of total water consumption) in 2004-05 to 810 GL (or 17%) in 2005-06. The decrease in groundwater used as a water source coincides with an increase in surface water consumption; from almost 2,800 GL (73% of total water consumption) to over 3,920 GL (or 82%).

One hypothesis for this trend is when more water is available for use from surface water storages (e.g. as in 2005-06, see graph 3.18) farmers use less groundwater for agricultural purposes. Conversely, when less surface water is available as a result of lower allocations induced by reduced water storage (e.g. in 2004-05), more groundwater is used. Although the data to support this hypothesis are limited, it would be expected that for 2006-07, when surface water storages were very low in the MDB, there may be some increase in the use of groundwater by farmers. Data which would enable this comparison are expected to be available in Water Use on Australian farms, 2006-07 (cat. no. 4618.0) in the near future.

3.17 Agricultural water consumption in New South Wales, by source—2004-05 and 2005-06(a)

2004–05
2005–06
Surface water
Groundwater
Total water consumption(b)
Surface water
Groundwater
Total water consumption(b)

Volume (GL)
2 797
949
3 810
3 921
810
4 795
Proportion of total water consumption (%)
73
25
100
82
17
100

(a) Care should be taken when comparing volumetric water source data between years, due to changes in statistical methodologies, changes in survey frames, and sampling error. Climatic conditions should also be taken into account. Percentages should provide a more indicative estimate.
(b) Includes other sources.
Source: Water Use on Australian Farms, 2004–05 and 2005–06 (cat. no. 4618.0)








Previous PageNext Page