Australian Bureau of Statistics

Rate the ABS website
ABS Home > Statistics > By Release Date
ABS @ Facebook ABS @ Twitter ABS RSS ABS Email notification service
1370.0 - Measuring Australia's Progress, 2002  
Previous ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 19/06/2002   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All RSS Feed RSS Bookmark and Share  
Contents >> Indicators of Australia's progress

This publication is about Australia's progress. It is intended to help Australians address the question, "Has life in our country got better, especially during the past decade?"

Answering the question is far from easy. Indeed there can be no definitive answer, because we all have our own views about what is most important to individual and national life. During 2000 and 2001, the ABS consulted a wide range of experts, organisations and individuals to understand what they saw as the most important dimensions of national progress. This publication presents indicators relating to some of those dimensions. The ABS hopes that Australians will use these headline indicators to form their own views of how our country is progressing.


ARRANGING THE INDICATORS

One way of assessing progress is to consider whether Australia is becoming wealthier (or is maintaining or depleting its wealth). Australia has many forms of wealth, some of which can be measured fairly accurately. In its broadest sense, Australia's wealth is made up of various stocks of assets that include:

  • human capital embodied in the knowledge, skills and health of individual Australians;
  • social capital embodied in the ways we live together;
  • natural capital embodied in our land, air, fresh waters, seas, and flora and fauna; and
  • produced and financial capital embodied in machinery, houses, buildings and other assets.

The nation has other forms of wealth, but many are less tangible and far harder to measure. While the spiritual, cultural and emotional wealth of the nation are all important, they are not measured here. (The reasons for this are discussed in the commentary Measuring Progress - an ABS approach.) Australia's international networks and external alliances are another resource not readily measured.

Some (but not all) of these components of Australia's wealth are included in the national balance sheet that forms part of the Australian System of National Accounts - these assets and Australia's liabilities to the rest of the world are discussed in the commentary National wealth.

For an asset to be included in the national balance sheet, some person or institution must be able to enforce ownership rights over it and to derive economic benefit from holding or using it. Produced and financial capital are included; but items of natural capital such as land, native forests and minerals are included only if they are used for economic purposes; and human and social capital are not included.

Some of the headline indicators relate directly to components of Australia's wealth.
  • Some aspects of social capital are discussed under Social attachment - and the liability side, as it were, of the social capital balance sheet is partly reflected in Crime.

Other aspects of progress are intimately linked to these varieties of wealth. For example, the commentaries National income, Economic disadvantage and inequality, and Work all shed light on how (and how well) Australia's human and other assets are being used. National income that is not consumed immediately constitutes saving and can be used to accumulate produced and financial capital. The income available to less well-off Australian households is discussed under Economic disadvantage and inequality.

Greenhouse gases flow into the air, and might, through global warming, affect other aspects of progress. Australians' Health and Education and training affect whether they Work (and what work they do); work can in turn generate national income.

One can arrange the progress indicators according to the broad variety of Australia's wealth to which they relate. This is, of course, only one of many different ways to display progress indicators.

The publication presents indicators for each of these dimensions. For most dimensions, one headline indicator is chosen. For crime and housing there are two headline indicators. No headline indicator has been chosen for social attachment.



Human capitalNatural capitalProduced and financial capitalSocial capital

HealthBiodiversityNational wealthCrime
Education and trainingLand (clearingNational incomeSocial attachment
and degradation)
Work WaterEconomic disadvantage
and inequality
Air qualityHousing
Greenhouse gases



ASSESSING PROGRESS

A reader's assessment of whether Australia is, on balance, progressing will depend on the relative importance he or she places on each dimension. For some readers, an improvement in the health and education of Australians might be more important than a decline in our biodiversity. Others might disagree.

The reader's overall assessment might also be based upon the strength of progress or regress in each dimension. Or it might be based on patterns that underlie the national trends - so it might be important to know not just whether health is improving for the Australian population overall, but also whether it is improving for particular groups of Australians (such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples). The commentary on each indicator provides additional information of these kinds.

The suite of indicators presented in this publication suggests progress in some areas of Australian life and regress in others. What follows is a very brief summary of information embodied in the headline indicators. Overall progress, as explained above, should not be assessed by simply counting the numbers of areas getting better and subtracting those getting worse. Some aspects of progress (especially aspects such as national income and national wealth) are more easily encapsulated in a small number of indicators, than are some social and environmental aspects of progress. And some readers will give greater importance to some progress indicators than others.


HUMAN

Three headline indicators are associated with human capital. All three suggest progress during the past decade.

Health. During the past decade, Australians' health improved - children born in 1999 were expected to live three years longer than those born in 1990. Indigenous Australians, however, can still expect to live some 20 years less than other Australians.

Education and training. During the 1990s, the Australian population became more educated - between 1990 and 2000 the proportion of people aged 25-64 years with a vocational or higher education qualification rose from 46% to 50%.

Work. Since the last recession in the early 1990s the unemployment rate has gradually declined, and the unemployment rate in 2001 was 6.7%.


NATURAL

It is difficult to obtain national time series data that encapsulate the changes in Australia's natural capital. Five of the six headline indicators suggest regress during the past decade.

Biodiversity cannot be measured comprehensively, but some experts, such as those on the State of the Environment Committee, believe Australian biodiversity declined during the past decade. This is partly encapsulated in a rise in the numbers of threatened birds and mammals.

Land clearance. In 1999, about 470,000 hectares of native vegetation were cleared, an annual rate some 40% higher than in 1991. Land clearance is one influence thought to be reducing biodiversity.

Land degradation. In 2000, about 5.7 million hectares of land were affected by, or at high risk of developing, dryland salinity, a widespread form of land degradation.

Inland waters. Detailed national time series data are not available. But a variety of partial evidence points to a decline in the quality of some of Australia's waterways. In 2000, about a quarter of Australia's surface water management areas were classed as highly used or overused.

Air quality. Australia's air remains relatively clean by the standards of other developed nations. The available indicators, such as the incidence of fine particle pollution in several cities, suggest that Australian air quality has improved during the past decade, despite increased motor vehicle use.

Greenhouse gas emissions in Australia increased by 17% between 1990 and 1999. Australia has some of the highest per capita emissions in the world, in part because of our heavy reliance on fossil fuel burning and also because of the Australian economy's structure.


PRODUCED AND FINANCIAL

Four headline indicators are presented. During the past decade, there has been progress in all four dimensions.

National wealth, as measured in Australia's balance sheet, grew during the 1990s. Real wealth per person increased moderately (by almost 1% a year) between 1992 and 2001.

National income can be used to fund current consumption of goods and services. Or it can be saved to accumulate wealth. Real income per head grew strongly during the past decade (by 2.5% a year) - appreciably stronger growth than during the preceding twenty years.

Economic disadvantage and inequality. The real income of less well-off Australians (those in the second and third lowest decile of the income distribution) increased between 1994-95 and 1997-98 by 5%. The incomes of better-off groups increased by a similar amount.


Housing. Australia's housing stock is a component of produced capital. The commentary focuses on two social aspects of housing: housing affordability and houses with insufficient bedrooms. Although not a widespread problem, the proportion of houses with insufficient bedrooms declined during the 1990s. The proportion of households experiencing problems with the affordability of their housing remained much the same over the four years 1994-95 to 1997-98.


SOCIAL

Two aspects of social capital are covered in the headline dimensions.

Social attachment refers to the nature and strength of relationships people have with one another. The publication presents a number of indicators showing how aspects of social attachment in Australia are changing, but none of these is accorded headline status. No assessment is made as to whether these changes signal progress or regress.

Crime. Through the 1990s there was an increase in the prevalence of some of the more common personal and property crimes reported to the police. According to police statistics, for every 100,000 Australians in 2000 there were about 2,300 instances of unlawful entry and 740 victims of assault.


LINKS BETWEEN DIMENSIONS OF PROGRESS

Most, if not all, of these dimensions of progress are linked. Changes in one dimension will be associated with changes in many others - sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. A few of these links are outlined in each headline commentary; but many other important links are not discussed.


PLANS FOR THE FUTURE

The next issue of Measuring Australia's Progress is tentatively planned for late 2003. The ABS hopes to build on this first issue to improve the publication in the future, recognising that it will doubtless evolve: important measures of progress may have been omitted, people's views about progress will change, and new data will become available.


Previous PageNext Page

Bookmark and Share. Opens in a new window


Commonwealth of Australia 2014

Unless otherwise noted, content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia Licence together with any terms, conditions and exclusions as set out in the website Copyright notice. For permission to do anything beyond the scope of this licence and copyright terms contact us.